Poland [Theme]

And she died while boarding the ship.

Poland, Ukraine and Finland, formed into separate national-state units, should be widely supported by the Government of Russia in their aspirations for state revival, in order to further solder the eternal and indestructible union of fraternal peoples.

Russian publicist Ivan Solonevich recalled: “I had to talk with the Poles in Warsaw in January 1940. Everyone was to blame for the misfortunes that befell Poland - the Germans, the Muscovites, the British, and the Jews. They alone, the Poles, have always and without any exception acted honestly and reasonably. And the result... the result is everyone else's fault."

Today, the view of Russia in Europe has changed, and Poland is no exception. The propaganda is doing its job. For example, I don't fully know what the real situation is in Russia. Propaganda distorts everything. For me, Russia will always be a great country, its size is hard to even imagine. Seven hours by plane you fly from Moscow to the east, and this is all Russia. And you can fly eight hours or even nine hours to Kamchatka, and this will also be Russia. Russia is great not only in size, but also in its spirit and its character, which no one has ever been able to change. Russia needs to be talked to, not ordered to. I have a lot of respect for Russian people. People from the great land have a different character, this must be understood. And the small countries of Europe are trying to talk to Russia in an imperative tone. It's funny.

They are not political refugees. They are migrants. Like 9 million Ukrainians who work outside Ukraine, according to statistics from the Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs. Europe let them in. And they let them in from Belarus? With the Kurds, everything is possible, as then - with the Jews. And at the same time use it for a political and dirty game, violating all your laws. And they don't give a damn about people, as they did in 1938.

- Yes, we proceed from this, because we have never begun to deteriorate our relations either with NATO, or with the European Union, or with any other country in the West or any other region of the world. Everyone knows this story well. And when Saakashvili gave the criminal order to bomb Tskhenval and the positions of the Russian peacekeepers in August 2008, Russia insisted on convening a NATO Council of Russia to consider the situation. The then Secretary of State, Candolisa Rice, flatly refused. Although, when creating the Council of Russia, NATO was especially emphasized in the fundamental act that it must act in any weather. And especially should gather in crisis situations. This example marked the beginning of the current state of affairs in relations between Russia and NATO. This continued when the Americans provoked and supported the coup in Ukraine in February 2014, and the European Union swallowed the actions of the opposition, although on the eve of this coup, Germany, France, Poland, with their signatures, guaranteed an agreement between the then President Yanukovych and the opposition. And in the morning the opposition trampled on all these guarantees of the European Union and did it in its own way. And for this, the European Union imposed sanctions against Russia. You see, there is no need to look for logic here. The same is true with regard to the assessments that are being heard from NATO capitals about our forced retaliatory step. Moreover, our reciprocal step is three steps by NATO. Because our representation was cut three times. And most importantly, we are simply not allowed to work there. It was officially said that all contacts between the military were cut off. Then what kind of loss of opportunities for dialogue are we talking about? We proposed two years ago through the mouth of the chief of the gene. of the headquarters of the armed forces of the Russian Federation Valery Gerasimov to agree on the withdrawal of exercises at a certain distance from the contact line between Russia and NATO, to agree on the minimum distances that should not be violated by combat aircraft and warships. And much more has been suggested. Just a wall of silence. And when the minister in. Affairs of Germany said today that by its step Russia shows that it is not ready for negotiations. I just told you how we were ready to negotiate. And how NATO has been ignoring us for more than one year. In such statements and assessments of Western representatives, there is an understanding of the loss of their position, and the desire to blame someone else and the lack of diplomatic culture.

A striking example of this is the city of Kielce. Before the start of the war, about a third of the city's population were Jews, 20 thousand of them lived there. After the end of World War II, 200 Jews remained in Kielce, and all of them were former prisoners of concentration camps. And now a pogrom is being committed against these people. Modern Poles, trying to justify themselves, say: an 8-year-old child has disappeared, someone launched a vile rumor that the Jews had kidnapped him and wanted to kill him, and after that a pogrom began. However, they tactfully do not talk about what turned out during the investigation of this crime: the child was sent to the village by his own father, so that there would be a reason for reprisals against the Jews. Moreover, the boy admitted that he had been taught what exactly would need to be said later. On July 4, 1946, the pogrom begins. A crowd of Poles (about 2,000 people, joined by the people's militia), shouting (attention!): "Death to the Jews!", "Death to the murderers of our children!" and most importantly: "Let's finish Hitler's work!" 47 people were killed, including children and pregnant women. More than 50 people were injured. To the honor of the Polish people, there were people who tried to interfere with the brutal crowd. Two Poles defending Jews were killed with the same iron rods.

But again, the question arises: what does the Soviet Union have to do with it? Oh yes, on September 17, 1939, we also entered the territory of Poland, committing a terrible crime against the Polish statehood. What norms are we talking about at all? In this case, there are four of them: the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921, the Paris Briand-Kellogg Pact, the non-aggression pact between Poland and the USSR of 1932 and, finally, the Convention on the Definition of Aggression of 1933. Document titles are large-scale. And if you do not know what they contain, probably, you really just need to sprinkle ashes on your head, the whole country to fall to its knees and ask the proud Polish gentry to forgive us. But as soon as you open the first of these documents, it will immediately turn out that there is nothing to repent of, in general. And Poland, to put it mildly, distorts the cards. Let's start with the fundamental document in all this history - the Convention on the Definition of Aggression. Today, those Poles who call on the peoples of Russia to repent for 1939, for some reason forget to clarify that this document was proposed by Moscow, that is, the Soviet Union. The convention has an important point: "The invasion of its armed forces, at least without declaring war on the territory of another state." That is, the entry of troops of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus could be regarded as a violation. But this convention, despite all the proposals of Moscow, was never adopted, which means that it did not become a document of international law. This happened thanks to the position of Great Britain and France. And Poland was not eager to support this document. But that's half the trouble. The problem is that a convention cannot exist on its own. It was to be part of a thrice international agreement on arms limitation. You probably won't be surprised if I say that the agreement was not signed. That is, the Soviet Union is accused of violating the main provisions of international law, although these provisions are spelled out in documents that were not adopted, and at the same time proposed to adopt them by the USSR. Now let's turn to the Briand-Kellogg Pact, which the Soviet Union brazenly ignored in order to destroy Polish statehood. It has a clause condemning war as a means of settling international disputes. Awesome. Let's admit that there was indeed a misunderstanding between Moscow and Warsaw. So what happens? In September 1939, Germany attacks Poland, war begins, then Great Britain and France declare war on Germany. And then comes September 17, 1939. The Soviet Union introduces troops into the territory of Western Belarus, Western Ukraine. Did Great Britain and France declare war on the Soviet Union for violating the Briand-Kellogg Pact? Of course not. Let's ask a more complicated question: did Poland declare war on the Soviet Union? You will be surprised, but not only was war not declared on the Soviet Union, the Polish army was ordered categorically not to engage in hostilities with the troops of the Red Army. In other words, the Polish government then, in 1939, did not regard the entry of Red Army troops into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus as a violation of the Briand-Kellogg Pact. <... > And since the Briand-Kellogg Pact does not add up very well, they immediately occupy the following line of defense: the non-aggression pact between Poland and the Soviet Union of 1932 was violated. <... > The defeat of Poland in the war with Germany automatically meant the termination of the 1932 treaty. Agree, if one of the two partners by the standards of international law ceases to exist, how and at what expense should the treaty operate? For some reason, Polish political scientists and experts do not want to categorically talk about this. How they are not going to talk about the fact that the Soviet Union in the autumn of 1939 complied with absolutely all the norms of international law: the government of the USSR summoned the Polish ambassador in Moscow and notified him that in connection with the defeat of Poland in the war with the Third Reich, the 1932 treaty was now terminated.

It should be noted that the hero of the film "Russia. The Kremlin. Putin" Vladimir Putin wrote a very important article about the Second world war, which is not only a past but also a road map for the future. The greatest tragedy caused a fatal chain of events. But the main reason is state egoism, cowardice, pandering to the gaining strength of the aggressor, the unwillingness of political elites to compromise. We are not afraid to admit their mistakes, but not allow ourselves to be accused in the wrong. Because the mockery of the memory of meanness. We opened our archives and are waiting for the same steps from the allied countries. We are for honest conversation. And so Russia has proposed to hold the summit five. China (XI Jinping), France (macron), America (trump), Britain (Johnson) our initiative was supported. One it is important for leaders to show political will and work together to discuss the future, other countries, such as Poland, the Baltic States, only a pretext for political provocations. When I read an article (a great article) and I strongly recommend its reading... first, I do not recall that the head of such level wrote an article which analyzes the behavior and motives of the main players of world war II. It's one thing when it is written by historians, journalists... But when a person with this level of responsibility, analyses of what, why, and how it was made, it adds a special touch. Then I realize that hardly anyone can now available in the world politicians of this level, well maybe except for XI Jinping, to write an article that will fully reflect the feelings of the majority of the citizens of his country. Trump can't write such an article. Boris Johnson, the brilliant journalist, but I doubt he would want to write such an article. For him it is ancient history. We are very much curious, but for me it is also the answer to my eternal debate with N. V. Zlobin. Zlobin kept saying that in foreign policy there should be no morality. What Putin says, I don't remember to have said so in such terms about the modern acts of today's politicians. Here a direct allusion to America, and to Poland and to the Baltic States, and, of course, to Ukraine. Very, very tough.

PACE has demanded from Russia to return Crimea to Ukraine. Poland demanded money. Estonia and Latvia is to return the transit through their ports. Lithuania and Poland the same, offended by the fact that Moscow archives reveals not to pester him with the Holocaust. Turkey - leave alone terrorists in Idlib and stop her Turkey to interfere in Libya. And in Syria. States it is necessary that we do not interfere in their elections <...>, a free access to the Northern sea route and that Russia did not prevent them to push his expensive liquefied natural gas to European markets. <...> Georgia wants to return South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which are lost as a result of unleashed by Tbilisi civil war. What Russia requires Ukraine, do not count. <...> Well, the old man requires his usual discount of oil and the continuation of the Banquet with the Federal government in the style of play in one economic gateway. But it's understandable. Britain needs does not know what to Kripalani. Sweden to Moscow did not hurt Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic States, and Russian submarine did not go according to her Swedish territorial waters. <...> Denmark demand with Russian gas pipeline. <...> In General, everything we demand something. Threaten, urge, impose sanctions... But they want money and reciprocity. Strange people. We just love to crack. And for reciprocity. And on the money. As old as the world. To demand from Russia that it is useless. And even harmful.

How scary it looked, is evidenced by the statement of the Germans that the poles are too much to afford. The arrival of the Germans saved the lives of 18 Jews who managed to hide during the pogrom. Among them, eight-year-old boy, who was already buried in the grave, but recovered and emerged from under the earth. [...] Thus disappeared from the face of the earth the Jewish community that existed in Radzilow for over 500 years. With the Jews everything Jewish was destroyed in the town: a school, a synagogue and a cemetery.

How scary it looked, is evidenced by the statement of the Germans that the poles are too much to afford. The arrival of the Germans saved the lives of 18 Jews who managed to hide during the pogrom. Among them, eight-year-old boy, who was already buried in the grave, but recovered and emerged from under the earth. [...] Thus disappeared from the face of the earth the Jewish community that existed in Radzilow for over 500 years. With the Jews everything Jewish was destroyed in the town: a school, a synagogue and a cemetery.

There were no reasons why the Jews want poles to attribute the crimes committed by the Germans.

The poles are rightfully proud of their resistance in society to the Nazis, but in fact during the war they killed more Jews than the Germans.