Book: Logical-philosophical treatise

This book will truly be understood only by those who have already independently come to the thoughts set forth in it - or at least indulged in reflections of this kind.

The fact that I do not indicate the sources has a simple explanation: I do not care if anyone else has thought about what I was thinking before.

"I" is in philosophy due to the fact that "the world is my world". The philosophical I is not the man, the human body and the human soul, referred to in psychology, but the metaphysical subject, the boundary - not of the world.

Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

My proposal explains the fact that the one who understand me, in the end realizes their futility if he rose with them - on them - above them (he must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he climbs on top of it). He must overcome these sentences, only then did he correctly see the world.

There are no pictures, which is obviously true.

If the proposal is NOT necessary, it is MEANINGLESS and approaching MEANING ZERO.