Anton Sandor LaVey. Satanic Bible (№ 255167)

When the puppy reaches maturity it becomes a dog; when ice melts, it becomes water; when they began to be used 12 months, we have received a new calendar with the appropriate name; when magic becomes scientific fact we relate to it as medicine, astronomy, etc. When the name is not suitable for more of this thing, it is logical to change it to something new, which better reflects its essence. Then why do not we follow that rule when it comes to religion? Why continue to call a religion the same name, if it has gone beyond its original essence? Or, if a religion preaches the same as always, but her followers do not practice in fact, none of its teachings, why do they still call themselves by the name given to the followers of the religion?