art [Theme] Page 107
I can't stand the theater, see it in historical perspective, primitive and rotten form of art, which recalls the rites of the stone age and all communal nonsense despite individual injections of genius, like, say, the poetry of Shakespeare or Ven Johnson, who, locking himself and not in need of actors, the reader automatically extracts from drama.
[Nutscracker] Imagine that you're watching the action and decides who shoots. If you choose to have the main character killed in the first firefight, where you will get the whole story? If you do have free choice, it might lead to very sad results. And art should delight and not sadness.
[Monstradamus It. And even if it saddens us, but this sadness should make us happy.
[Nutscracker] in-In. So actually no interactivity is not the case - it is apparent. Or, let's say, it is allowed in the narrow zone where any choice will not change the fact. The main problem is to get rid of freedom of choice, hard to get to the desired solution, while maintaining confidence that the choice is free. Scientifically it is called forced alignment.
The artist's task - to build order out of chaos. Assemble the parts, looking for a common line, can be arranged. Give meaning to meaningless facts. Lay out the puzzle pieces of the world. Mix and reorganize. Combine. Mount. Screwed.
We will all die. The goal is not to live forever, the goal is to create something that will live.
"Mona Lisa" by Leonardo - just a thousand thousand smears of paint. "David" by Michelangelo - a million blows of the hammer. Each of us is a million pieces correctly assembled into the whole, nothing more.
From famous artists to contractors, builders, we all want to leave their signature. Own residual effect. The life after death.
Lying is fiction, fiction is art, then all art is a lie.
