Larisa Bocharova. (№ 180826)

This genre can be defined as "iconography". Without icons life fresh, it is an old truth. But, you know, a pop icon and a gay icon is not the channel on the background of this mess. Gold salaries, too much ruin everything for them is not visible fate. Iconography is the most strict genre, because it does not forgive hack-work. It is impossible to have too much pathos, they will laugh. It is impossible to protect the hero. It is impossible to make a hero invulnerable and too powerful, with a mountain of muscles (this is armor, it is prohibited), immortal, with figs in your pocket, with superhuman genome, too intelligent and all-knowing (knowledge - armor, it is prohibited), you cannot do the hero married, water-borne, family (family armor), the ultimate love of life must coexist with Thanatos, because only against the background of Thanatos life looks sharp, clear, poetic. The hero can't be rough, heavy face. It should not be Mature. This is some long-forgotten category of "beautiful", which I remember, in my opinion, only the Japanese. So all sane people watch anime with proformance teenagers, each of which runs the Mission. It is unbearably painful to see the efforts of Hollywood with his excellent understanding of the need for Heroics ("the Avengers" shout a bunch of supermen) and full sucking action of the foundations of the genre. No idea. "Humanity" of Hollywood, for which beat last decades all the beautiful muzzle of America is a glamorous hollow form, in which there is nothing. No motivation - to save humanity. Mankind absolutely FSUs, because the only reaction it's capable of is screaming to escape from the stones from the sky, munching on a Burger or moving in front of a baby carriage. How would the dialogue by saving all needed. Salvation and indifferent nevernogo object is just a corporate entertainment that is concerned only with the masturbator rescue.