Author of quotes: Vladimir Rudol'fovich Solovyov. Page 3

Any artwork by its nature cannot and should not be documentary. It is always the understanding of historical events. Therefore, the concept of truth seems on a completely different level and a different understanding. But the fact that they try using favorite Russian blogger Overton window to introduce in mass consciousness that we are not the ones, not we are.
It should be noted that nobody knows the truth, ever. By definition. She's just completely different. And when we speak of a certain truth, we should clearly realize that the truth - generational. And not by chance each generation understands the truth differently. Perceives in his own way. And that's a difficult question. Because the films seemed to be truthful, clear and transparent one generation now will not be accepted. The truth always comes through perception. Because the concept of truth is very subjektiivne. We can't show the documentary set of facts and say that that's true. Because the truth is in the interpretation.
We do not have the concept of narrative and we are not going to build something like the Americans. We have a different culture. We have it - the memories of veterans. We strive to meet your Americans idea of us. And the truth is only we have complete rights. Because we paid for the ultimate price.
The truth about the war is extremely simple. It is. And this criterion of truth is applicable to any film. The truth is: we - the people-the winner, we saved the world from absolute evil, Nazi terrible plague, and nobody ever this historical truth cannot change. We - the people of the liberator.

I'm not sure that any dialogue is better than war. About the fact that "any negotiations are better than war", I do not agree. Because Munich had proceeded with this logic. And it turned out that led to far more terrible war. Sometimes there are people that just don't need to talk.

Now I do not see the development of social and political Sciences. I don't see the discussions, formulation of objectives neither the economy nor in the whole spectrum of social Sciences. And it is very dangerous. We therefore are unable to articulate where we are going. Why is it important to look in the past? To realize the error of Malta began much earlier. It started with the fact that Gorbachev came without any idea about the idea and ideology and why to do it all.

I do not agree that the section and the front line of a new cold war will be exactly like (the economy, the fake war ghouls). It seems to me that the main front, which will unleash the battle will be up front science and technology. Because of technological breakthroughs, which now happens efficiently can derive a number of countries in a whole new way of reproduction. And those who remain on a different level, there will be no chance to catch up, at least in the next 10-20-30 years. Therefore, we need to understand that the future of the country depends on science, from scientists, from the struggle for the younger generation of scientists and technological and scientific breakthroughs. But this should be done not accountants and not the pseudo-economists.

In America, that beautiful country has achieved a lot, there is the basic approach: if your President too praised abroad, this is bad. So he's doing something wrong for your country. The main mistake of our leaders was a desire to please the West and not his people. This error is necessary to get rid once and for all. The only people who should like the leader of a country is the people. And for that we need to do the following: to give up many of the misunderstandings that we have entrenched in the minds. In particular, we will be happy to suggest the West is the true and right path. If you look at the methods by which the withdrawal of America is its economy out of the crisis, and compare it with the methods that the American experts had recommended to us, you are very surprised. A diametrically opposite approach. And not because of the economy. But because other tasks. They are not interested in the development of our economy. We need to stop being naive. Today was the science Board. Here is what we must do. We should have great science, which should be based on a great education, and we should have a great economy. Not a carbon copy of pretty funny misconceptions 70-ies, and their own understanding of what should be the economy, that the country was prosperous with rich people and with a powerful army. With outstanding health care. And with a happy people.

I, as a person educated in Soviet times, clearly shared class interest and political elites and fraternal relations of peoples. "Children of different Nations, we dream of a world living".

Interestingly, while the Glory will go Mike says: "Dementia and courage"? This is a great motto!

We need to clearly understand that we have very little time. And we need to ensure the defense capability of the country to Wake up.

It is necessary to go from drawing plans to improve life to improve life.

- Let's first understand what freedom is. The monument of freedom in Russia has, it is all of Russia.
- How is it?
- So. Because Russia is one of the rare States which exist in that form for centuries, and if you look from the point of formation of Russia, she had no one to defend, to be free, because the Tatar-Mongol yoke was before the formation of Russia as a state. We have freedom not perished. Put a monument that went. This is the peculiarity of the Russian language. The monument is a monument to what is not.

90-ies - it was the rare case when Russia deliberately refused ideology. And so collapsed all the institutions which this ideology was based. Was offered a different ideology. Ideology in Russia has always been. The Bolsheviks were an ideology. And these what was the ideology? Steal? Science you killed [referring to Kucherena] . Family values? It is time to remember family values 90s. do You remember - the main song "Putana, Putana, Putana".

All forms of flattery I prefer direct and rude...

If the king has no luck [luck] in the history, it can be anything, he will hate. In the end, it is very important - you're lucky or not lucky.

[turning to Nikolai Zlobin] If a person lives, and it seems that he's all right, he had to go to a psychiatrist. Always in society there are problems. If this society is still alive.