communism [Theme] Page 7

All the preceding classes that got yourself the upper hand sought to fortify their already acquired status in life, subordinating all of society to their conditions of appropriation. The proletarians cannot become the social productive forces except by abolishing their own previous mode of appropriation, and thereby also every other previous still the mode of appropriation. The proletarians have nothing of their own that would have them protect, they must destroy all that is still guarded and secured private property.

You are practical people and those who only eat and drink, bring, lead. But every time something you do not work, every time people do not obey your logic, doing seemingly contrary to common sense, and you, the leaders, either deny it or simply not think why this is so. But if someone ask this question, say, what compels people who only eat and drink want to go beyond your canons, you raise the cry of "Utopian! Mystic! Metaphysician!" However, why I'm talking about you, the person practical? But just like you, involved ordinary people who only eat and drink bring, in the worst of the troubles, which only remembers the story.

You slaves dream of a society where the law of development will be cancelled, which will not die weak and unfit, unsuitable where everyone will get plenty of food, where all will be married and everyone will have progeny - the weak as well as strong. And what happens? Strength and vitality will not increase from generation to generation. On the contrary, will decrease. Here is your retribution for your slave philosophy. Your society of slaves, built by slaves and for slaves, are inevitably going to fade and crumble to dust - as will weaken and degenerate the members of this society.

Think about it, son, in the goal of building communism: for what we work, planned and executed our plans? In the name of the happiness of man. Communism is not something divinely incomprehensible, rising above the faceless mass of people. Communism - in the man, in his happiness. To build communism means to create happiness to every person, every family, and this is impossible without happy companies...

Proudhon and the Communists struggle with selfishness. Therefore, their doctrine is only a continuation and the conclusions of the Christian principle, the principle of Love, of self-sacrifice in the name of universal, alien. They conclude, for example, owned only the fact that has long existed, namely, the absence of ownership have individual personalities. So they - the enemies of selfishness, but because they are Christians, or more generally the religious people who believe in ghosts, the Ministers of some General concepts (God, society etc.). And even Proudhon is likened to the Christians that he recognized God what denies the people. So, he calls God the owner of the land. This he proves that he can't get free from the submission of the owner; as a result, he comes to the owner, but puts it in the other.
Political liberalism, like everything religious, counts on respect, humanity, love. So he is constantly experiencing grief. In practice people respect nothing, and every day the small possessions are bought by large owners, and the "free people" turn into casual labourers.
If, on the contrary, the "small owners" have the sense that the large property belongs to them, they would not have lost her and it would be impossible to deny possessing it.

Distribution boss will give me something that tells him his sense of justice and loving concern for all. For me, a single individual, is equally uncomfortable and collective wealth, and the wealth of other single individuals, because both are not mine; all belong to the good of the whole society, which pays me a portion of those benefits, or to individual possessors, is for me the same constraint, because neither the one nor the other I can't dispose of. And communism, destroying all private property, even more, makes me dependent on another, namely, from society, and no matter how he attacked on "the state", he again seeks to establish a "state" known to the system, constraining my freedom of activity, establishing the Supreme power over me. Communism rightly revolts against the oppression I experience from individual proprietors, but more frightening, that power he will give to society.

To equate communism and Christianity would be the obvious mistake.
In the gospel, the precepts of Christ, the doctrine of the Church, the images of the saints <...> you'll find good news of the coming of the Kingdom of God, a call to love, to gentleness, to sacrifice, to serve others, to purity of heart, and you will not find incitement to violence, to anger, to revenge, to hatred, to greed. Marx inspired communism, in his theory, his ideology, you will find incitement to violence, hatreds and malice of one class to another, for revenge, for selfish struggle for its own interests, and will not find anything about love, sacrifice, humility, spiritual purity.

God does not want rape, doesn't want the appearance of the triumph of truth, the wants of human freedom.
<...> It is the truth of Christ can be forcibly implemented. Communism wants to live out his truth through violence, denies the freedom of the spirit, because it denies the spirit, and because it is easier to realize this truth. That's why this is an unfounded argument against Christianity based on the failure of Christianity in history. To the Kingdom of God cannot be forced...

I know that raising the rage of the working masses against the bureaucratic distortions of our organizations, it is sometimes necessary to hurt some of our comrades, with past achievements, but is now suffering from bureaucratic disease. But it really can stop our work of organizing control from below? I think that can not and should not. Old achievements should bow down before them in the belt, but for new bugs and the bureaucracy could give them on the ridge. How could it be otherwise? Why not, if required by the interests of the case?

Of course, the case of Russia not so much harder because of the severity of the sentences, but because of the fact that the state, instead of itself according to the great ideology of Marx, all the more strengthened through the bureaucracy, militarism, the police, etc.

If capitalism is a system in which simple existence is meaningless, that communism (socialism) - a system of existence without reality.

The Communists waged an unending war against civilization to destroy all the institutions of government, all governments, all countries in the world. They strive to create the international Union of beggars, criminals, mediocrities, the rebels, the sick, morons and fools, which should cover the whole world.

We decided to build a temple. Will we, in the end, even though the chapel? No. We did not succeed even to the toilet. We built musty kitchen with an old stove! We put on the fire a kettle and began to prepare the brew of blood, ash and steel. What have we got? A new humanity? The people of granite? Or at least a terrible monster? No. We people are meandering nonentities. Gutta-percha, two-faced creatures. These puny humans don't even need to be punished. They dutifully take the whip into their own hands and flog themselves. You never had a chance to attend any of the circle of political education? It would not hurt. There you can learn a lot about the human spirit.

The road to the Russian bad weather
flowed through the faith and joy;
the collective path to happiness,
the overall bitter hangover.