TV show: Rush hour. Page 4

There is a policy of principles, and there are policy consequences. I feel closer to the second. If you reveal your intentions and desires on the consequences and on some moral basis, it is likely that you will be mistaken less.

Method of decision-making is, first and foremost, procedures and methods that allow you to make the right decisions. And there is another indispensable condition. The person taking the decision should know exactly what he wants. This man should be filled with certain convictions. It needs to be committed to a certain idea, he needs something to strive for this criterion to choose the people around him. But also, if this man wants his country was free and decent, he creates such conditions that do not allow to happen arbitrariness in decision making. It distributes power, it creates the normal functioning of the government, it gives controlling functions to the Parliament and then he is not subject to what can happen if someone at the last minute before sleep came and advised. That's the main thing, perhaps, where I could start to make decisions as necessary for the country. In addition, it is important that this person felt the country. Understand what she wants. In fact, power in this sense is the realization of that for which you elected or brought to power.

Today we are talking about ecology as about the air, earth, grass and animals. But if we recognize that we are not only biological systems, physiological and social, we are spiritual systems. Somewhere there is a niche for environmental - our spirituality. And this ecological niche in humanity, spirituality, is a child. This is pure water, which then will drink of humanity. It's the dirty water, which then will drink of humanity.

What is the business? Is that the case? Children and business is good. But then the most important thing is studying. It's hard work. And it is not making small valuables, and yourself need to make a value in itself. I stand when I'm young and I don't understand almost nothing and I learned physics, and I learned the art, I its price increased, and this baby business. This baby thing.

We need to remember that we have not had Dreiser, nobody wrote "the Financier" and "Genius". We had no Faulkner. No one was smykal as Balzac in "the Human Comedy" showed the relationship of morality, status, money and so on. We have in Russian literature there are five books about the rich.
Mamin-Siberian, "Pavlovskaya millions" - all the bandits. "Gold" Mamin-Sibiryak - all thieves. "Gloom-river" Shishkov - all the wolves. "The Artamonov business" Gorky: wealth is degeneration. And, for example, in "Two captains" Daisy in the first Chapter Kaverin at shore money. As a logical extension of this, the last Home sold and betrayed his friends. So, you have to understand that even in the Russian epic, where there is no fantastic element fiction begins immediately where the question of money. Where did Sadko money? And this is from the bottom of the sea, is complexity.

Every actor wants to play his contemporary. But contemporary for me - not only the man who lives next door, and he whose life even it belongs to another age, resonates with life today. And so, for example, is important not just to condemn Klim Samgin, which I download the film Theater. VL. Mayakovsky, and explore his life and the reasons due to which smart, intelligent man was sluggish and uncertain in their positions. Show that today, a compromise in the end leads to spiritual death and total destruction of the individual.

If you make a bad film that you have to love his Homeland or the need to love the mother, the child remains indifferent to the idea that you must love your mother and Motherland. And raising is just the opposite purpose than was required. Children's movie brings up is not because it is childish, but because it is art.

Today's children are the ones who will decide the fate of the country in ten years. And if now to convince them that the best goods overseas, if regale them "Sneakers" instead of candy factory "Red October", it is easy to imagine what will be the citizens of Russia in the early XXI century. Therefore, it is necessary in that whatever was to revive the market, educating young viewers.

- When there was censorship, you never said you [in his monologue] mock Russian women?
- No, never. There were, of course, party ladies in his time, who thought I was kidding. Mikhail Mikhaylovich Zhvanetsky was a monologue in which the woman says, "Doo-Doo-Doo, top-top-top, the country is trembling: that our women go to work". And one of these ladies came to me after a concert and said, "Where you saw our woman, to "Doo-Doo, top top, the earth trembles"? It's what are you kidding me?" What I very timidly told her, "you don't see, because you drive cars and I ride the subway. Go down the metro and you shall see such women.

- What do you love about men the most?
- Mind and generosity. Good quality men's.
- You can be smart, but to be a bore, for example, or to have very slippery character. What is the mind?
- Intellect. I'm not saying that I love men, smart by nature, sohee. <...> I think if the person is smart, he knows how to do everything in this life.

- In his normal life you like the cat Matroskin?
- Sylvester I personality pretty deeply. It is, perhaps, the first serious Russian businessman. And much in our economic perestroika innovations began, of course, with him. He first began to rely on their own strength without falling in, say, the radicalism of Kim Il sung.
But when you can, and the postman Pechkin used as a prototype of the KGB.

Disappointment is the most terrible thing that affects people. We cannot allow people disillusioned.

The problem of human rights will always exist in any democratic state. If human rights were guaranteed not only by laws but also genuinely protected, society must always follow the power, no matter how democratic that power may be.

- This is probably the men came up. Because nobody could say of the men about his companion - "Inferior, but mine." But women say, "Well, let inferior, but for her."
Is so embedded in our consciousness. So it should be - a woman nearby was certainly a man, a no. I believe that a no no, better then don't.