Book: iPhuck 10. Page 1

I sincerely believe that the monarchy is a useful institution, especially in our troubled times. After all, what distinguishes monarchy from the so-called "representative democracy"? The fact that in the worst case the monarchy will be headed by one - only one - bad man. And in the so-called "representative democracy" at the top will always be crawling with hundreds of disgusting worms senators, each of which has its own nefarious agenda, and the state all ready the information govnocherpiev. As discussed earlier, the monarch may be a good guy by accident. A politician for anything.

When I wrote the last paragraph, everything was fine. That is all there is. But it is here, teaches Chinese philosophy, and you receive the first crack at the future site of the abyss.

To gurgling in the mainstream of information should be approached only in a full suit of biological protection and to look carefully - what, where, and how. And it is better not to come at all, content with watching the just-arrived - for example, in social networks. This is usually enough. I, for instance, have long realized that less is more...

Anyone installs downloaded from the network program on your device with great care. And because they can be erased. In a pinch you can throw away the device and buy a new one. But the main drive in my head, which did not change until death one trustingly puts up anything. Immediately and with the songs of burns in the neurons of all our short "always".

I, alas, know too well from experience - when I was a schoolgirl, I dreamed of writing poetry and memorizing an enormous number of different poets and poets in three languages. And it was necessary to avoid the poems and to read good prose. I already knew then, when I became an art critic.

... For the same reason, by the way, all the brilliant experts on someone else's work be so insignificant as creators - more successful predecessors forever hacked their heads, and now there is only the stench and smoke. There is no smoke without fire, I agree, but that does not make the chimney of the fireplace.

I Heidegger did not study the Lord allowed. And Sartre only know because he talked a lot about art and I need it for work. But I've seen what happens to those who avidly read these two and the entire rest of the list, likely to enter the business - especially when the poor are to read seriously. Oy vey. But for some reason remains a consensus that "there are things you need to know".
No, it is clear that the teachers of so-called "humanitarian Sciences" necessary food supply. But this state of Affairs is, in my opinion, sabotage. To say young and fresh mind: here have a read of that for the development of Heidegger, Sartre, and Vedrova Beyond is how to advise young village beauty: to know life, girl have sex ten times with each of the twelve solar mechanics in your depot. It does, of course - touching the obedient poor. And life, in a sense, knows. But beauty will not remain: first, never wash off Tits, and second, to piss diesel fuel until the end of his days.
Philosophical simulators do not educate the mind. They distort it. When the head develops in a similar way, it download software, which immediately begins to participate in each of your "meet the Genesis." And by uploading this software, you ago will not pump out.

If philosophers built their palaces made of bricks, not of words, they would have planted as incompetent after the first laying, because the force of gravity immediately entered into a dialogue with them. But the words are the bricks that will be a thousand years hang in the air in any place where they will stick, so to fool others for very long...

I know not all, but only what you wish to know. As my friend Shiva, the omnipotence necessary in the first place in order to limit the omniscience.

At such depths, of course, dives are not each user, so bugs are not visible to anyone. Generally speaking, our whole life by and large consists of bugs, and the difference between happy and unhappy fate is how we respond.

Linguadue (prof. SL.) - NLP technique, which is based on modern philosophy and theoretical study of art. The essence of L. - the creation and use of language constructs, reflecting nothing but the combinatorial possibilities of language, with the aim of the paralysis of another's consciousness. In fact, this linguistic denial of service attack, trying to "hang" the human mind, causing it to continuously scan and analyze obscure combinations of words with a huge number of possible vague polymylos.

This used to be called "poetic retribution", and even earlier - karma.
Do not be proud, the artist, never be proud and not vaznonis - for all you create light and shade can disappear in a single moment.

iPhilm industry, or "akinator" (why would marketers not to let us simply "if" or even "K-IP" - all understand about what speech) today is developing in the same direction as all other types of "entertainment": empty dynamics, repetition has made once the cashier cliché, virtue signalling in the form of obsequious submission the last squeak of the left censorship (issues for the business does not need anyone) - and a complete rejection of all that can at least linger a while in the mental gut. The consciousness of the consumer should remain empty and ready to receive a new product until we wrote this sentence, on the outskirts of his eyes, ears and nose already formed a wildly beeping tube. It is not surprising that discerning connoisseurs doubt whether it is possible to consider Ifilm art or better to include them in the genre of pornography - popular, but not the shadow of the wing of a Muse.

I can't speak about the main thing; it seems to me that the rough Burr will be crushed caught between the truth and erase it in the sand. Better not to think about it; the new must grow by itself. No, not to disturb even mentally...