dispute [Theme] Page 34



We do not want churches because they will teach us to argue about God.
№ 45677   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 21:08
In philosophical discussion more wins is defeated in the sense that it multiplies the knowledge.
№ 45247   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 20:51
The worst mistake is to respond with emotions to the emotions of the opponent. Instead - solid, measured response.
2 Season 13 Series
№ 44142   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 20:07
History will judge us.
№ 43588   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 19:45
If you're only focusing on the consciousness of his innocence, contrasting the force you will suppress you. This is the most common mistake.
№ 40798   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 17:50
Well it said that in a dispute between two parties, the court obliged both sides to listen.
№ 39941   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 17:18
When two people talking and one of them is angry, the one who is inferior, smarter.
№ 39935   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 17:18
- Well, you tell me, please, is it possible to do without a fight? Any dispute can be resolved with words!
- Yes here, you do something well, you have, dad, mom, and you, mother, there's daddy, and I have no one, no one, not even a dog...
№ 38578   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 16:20
It is considered that the dispute in equal usually the winner is the one who is smarter. Bullshit!.. First, the stupid always believe in their own right, in the time, as clever forever in her doubt. In addition, smart understands the arguments of the enemy and stupid - no, even a split... And if in addition to remember that the fools, and even luck, then who, one wonders, the two of them should emerge victorious?
Only in one case intellect weighed the poor guy can anyone argue: if the time to think to pretend to have already quite a complete idiot. Take, for example, the same politicians... do You think they and life are the same as in the Parliament?.. Of course not! In life it is brightest. Well, think for yourself: would some average ordinary fool achieve the high degree of idiocy, for which voters ' confidence in its Deputy becomes truly limitless?..
№ 38436   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 16:15
To better understand the dispute between your enemies than between friends, because obviously then one of your friends become your enemy and one enemy - your friend.
№ 37938   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 15:57
First you need to drive! Because drive can always...
№ 36832   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 15:15
The conduct of the dispute should be simple: don't listen to the other person, and examine him or to sing, looking in eyes. In the most acute moment to ask the document, to verify residence, to ask the characteristic from a work place, easy to go to "you", say: "this is not none of your fucking business", and your partner will be softened, as scalded.
№ 36097   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 14:46
We have too much to talk, discuss, argue, since, as the abolition of censorship, we pound water in a mortar. Infinitely dreary, all the more cynical. Because of this, and go crazy. From words and assumptions.
№ 35414   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 14:20
If you want to win a person, let him beat you in the dispute.
№ 34883   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 14:01
Don't need to know anything to argue about anything.
№ 34008   Added MegaMozg 02-01-2017 / 13:28