censorship [Theme]

They are afraid and continue to bark.

Forbidding words is the most stupid thing that can be. If you don't have words to explain reality, you become dumb. Now we're all starting to mumble. Why ban it? A ban is in any case a sign of impotence. Political technology should have soft power. You must win in rhetoric, you must win in argument. If we ban the word brunette, then what, will everyone become blonde? No.

We don't know about anything. Well then. Open windows will be closed.

The era of the “information revolution” is also the era of Disinformation: if yesterday the lack of information and censorship characterized totalitarian states that reject democracy, today the opposite is happening. TV viewers are misinformed, overloaded with information, frankly contradictory information. <...> The globalitarian state of economic and strategic alliances is no longer the good old censorship with scissors, it is Babylon. Henceforth <...> conscious manipulation has become indistinguishable from an unintentional occurrence.

The Internet sees censorship as a bug and works around it.

Gray, gray, gray, gray.

We are a youth magazine, and you tell about some incredible things. Well, where did you see husbands cheating on their wives? I personally don't remember that. And then, these are our husbands, these are our wives. Absolutely atypical.

Censorship as a system of norms dominating a person does not give an outlet to the surface of consciousness for his asocial destructive impulses. The unconscious seeks roundabout ways, follows the crooked paths of fantasy - and along the way creates art, which is contraindicated in direct speech.

... states are systems through which coercion is carried out. Groups within a state can compete for loyalty by giving the appearance of democracy, but the founding of states is the systematic use and prevention of violence. Land ownership, property rights, annuities, dividends, taxation, court fines, censorship, copyrights, trademarks are all imposed under the threat of state violence.

Hertzmanovsky-Orlando, a Swift satirist, never dared to publish his Cockroach in 77 years of his life.

In the sense? If I'm afraid, then you fucked up and wrote with shit on the window Let's go !. The censorship of the scoops simply did not pass.

This book is about the war, and it looks like a piece of bacon: it contains layers of reports from Afghanistan, where I worked for almost four years as a war correspondent, and pages from my diary. In the reports - what the military censorship allowed for publication, and in the diary - what I wanted to say and remember. The book was started right after the war ended and I crossed the bridge over the Amu Darya on the penultimate Soviet armored personnel carrier, and it is finished today ...

What an idle occupation all our undercensored literature! Everything that needs to be said that can be useful to people in the field of domestic, foreign policy, economic life and, most importantly, religious, everything that is reasonable is not allowed. It's the same in public activities. There remains children's fun. "Play, play, kids. The more you play, the less opportunity you have to understand what we're doing." As it became undoubtedly clear to me.

My powerful potential, whatever it is
expressed, -
Helpless. That thought caught up with me.
(Although that phrase is us, if
we need to cut out -
holy, for the federal channel).