Author of quotes: Konstantin Anatolyevich Krylov



... socialism as an alternative to capitalism was blown away pretty quickly. It is now generally accepted that the "great social utopias" suffered a final collapse at the end of the last century, with the destruction of the USSR and the socialist bloc. In fact, already in the sixties, the same USSR was not a "society of victorious utopia" in any way. It was a completely recognizable society of under-consumption, reminiscent of similar societies in the middle-developed countries of the Third World. The difference with the "third world" was that the Soviet people suffered not from a lack of money, but from a lack of goods. But the essence was the same: the basic social structures of Soviet society were, in general, similar to those in the West, only there were fewer resources. The Soviet people suffered severely from this, as people suffer from any discrepancy. By the way, now that Russia has finally been thrown into the third world, there is more suffering from hunger, cold, hopelessness, but less from inconsistency. There is poverty all around, there is also poverty inside, there are no prospects, but there are no false hopes either. "Everything is smooth." The world is in balance.
Quote Explanation: from the book by Konstantin Krylov "Russians in spite of Putin"
№ 413379   Added MegaMozg 11-02-2021 / 03:21
... the fascist states emerged as alternatives to the socialist ones: these were "denials of negation", and by no means dialectical.
Quote Explanation: from the book by Konstantin Krylov "Russians in spite of Putin"
№ 413378   Added MegaMozg 11-02-2021 / 03:18
An anti-national state is a state in which one of the most oppressed nations exists. In our case, this national majority is Russians. Then there is the pyramid of peoples. Some nations are also oppressed, some have a little more rights and are used, as for example the Sith were used in India to keep the indigenous population in submission and fear. And the anti-national elite sits on top, the main feature of which is not even that it is different in blood, but that it is absolutely different in spirit. She perceives the population as cattle, slaves, herd. And she perceives herself as masters who must manage this "cattle" exclusively for themselves.
№ 412606   Added MegaMozg 01-02-2021 / 02:12
I believe that Russia is not an empire. If only because it is actually a colony. It is a country ruled by colonial methods. The metropolis can be considered, for example, the Kremlin, as well as some places outside Russia, such as Courchevel. Russia is ruled by an anti-national elite, which perceives the population as conquered natives, for example, how the British perceived the Hindus in their time. They built a pyramid of peoples, some of which are close to oppressing the natives, and most of the peoples have no rights and exist as a colonial population. First of all, this concerns the Russians. Therefore, Russia can be called, I would say, not an empire, not a national state, but an anti-national state. This will be the most accurate scientific definition of what we live in.
№ 412605   Added MegaMozg 01-02-2021 / 02:09
When was the last time you bought in a store of cheap and quality goods Chechen? Who ever bought products of the Chechen production? There are? No? No, it means, stores products of the Chechen production. I honestly have not seen in stores and goods Ingush, and Dagestani TV does not. I just don't see Adyghe electronics. And a lot of things I still do not see. I have a suspicion, my friends, that they do not produce there is no-thing... Maybe in the Caucasus, the Caucasians overproduction and underproduction of everything else? It's time to put an end to this strange economic model.
Quote Explanation: At the rally "Stop feeding the Caucasus", October 22, 2011.
№ 365201   Added MegaMozg 27-03-2019 / 19:02