Author of quotes: Adolf Hitler

So, if we want our world won, we should be able to turn it into a fighting movement.

To learn history means to be able to search and find the factors and forces that led to those or other events, which we then had to admit historical events.

We do not tolerate anyone in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity. In fact our movement is Christian.

We started the fight against the atheistic movement, and it is not limited to a few theoretical declarations: we have eradicated.

Never reconciled with the existence of two continental powers in Europe! In any attempt in Germany to create a second military power, or even only the state can later become a major military power, you need to see a direct attack on Germany. It that situation, you have not only the right, but you must fight against it with all means, including the use of weapons. And you have no right to calm down until you manage to destroy it, if it had already occurred.

A desperate struggle for existence, which you just conducted himself, often killing you any compassion for those who are out in people failed.

All the creative ideas of man in General terms, appear already in the period of his youth.

The monstrous lie, the more likely you will believe. Ordinary people would rather believe a big lie than to a small. This corresponds to their primitive soul. They know that small they are able to lie well, so very much lie they will hesitate. The big lie just won't come to their mind. That is why the mass can't imagine that others were capable too monstrous lie. And even when they explain that it is about the lie of monstrous proportions, they will still continue to doubt, and will be inclined to think that perhaps, after all here is the truth...

I know many who "read" infinitely much - book by book, letter by letter; and yet I will not call these people anything but "well-read." Of course, these people have a lot of "knowledge", but their brain is completely unable to properly absorb, register and classify the perceived material. They absolutely do not have the art to separate in the book the valuable from the unnecessary, the necessary to keep in mind, and it is superfluous, if possible, to simply not see and in any case not burden oneself with ballast. After all, reading is not an end in itself, but only a means to an end. Reading aims to help a person gain knowledge in the direction that is determined by his abilities and his determination. Reading gives a person the tools that he needs for his profession, regardless of whether it is a simple struggle for existence or satisfaction of a higher purpose. But on the other hand, reading should help a person make up a general world outlook. In all cases, it is equally necessary that the content of what is read is not deposited in the brain in the order of the table of contents of the book. The task is not to burden your memory with a certain number of books. It is necessary to ensure that, within the framework of the general worldview, the mosaic of books finds an appropriate place in the mental luggage of a person and helps him strengthen and expand his worldview. Otherwise, only chaos results in the reader’s head. Mechanical reading is completely useless no matter what the unhappy reader swallowing books thinks about it. Such a reader sometimes considers himself to be “educated” in the most serious way, imagines that he has learned life well, that he has enriched himself with knowledge, and yet, in fact, as such “education” grows, he more and more moves away from his goal. In the end, he ends up either in a sanatorium or as a “politician” in parliament. He who works so hard on himself will never be able to use his chaotic “knowledge” for the purposes that arise before him at any given moment. His mental ballast is not in the line of life, but in the line of dead books. And although life will push him many times to take something really valuable from books, this unfortunate reader will only be able to refer to such and such a page read in the book, but he will not be able to apply it to life. At every critical moment, such sages sweat their faces in books of analogies and parallels and, of course, inevitably fall into the sky with a finger. If this were not so, then the political actions of our other learned rulers would be completely inexplicable. Then we would have left the only conclusion: instead of pathological inclinations, to ascertain the properties of simple scammers in them. The same person who knows how to read correctly, will be able to use any book, any newspaper, any brochure he reads in such a way as to take from it everything really valuable, everything really having not only transient value. He will be able to dismember and assimilate the acquired new material in such a way that it will help him clarify or replenish what he already knew before, get new material that helps to justify the correctness of his views. If life suddenly poses new questions in front of such a person, his memory will instantly tell him from what he reads what is needed for a given situation. From the material that has accumulated in his brain for decades, he will be able to quickly mobilize what is needed to understand the new problem posed and to correctly answer it. Only such a reading makes sense and purpose.

Our movement are unable to damage any prosecution of its leaders, no libel, no slander. Out of all the persecution, it came out more and more strong because our ideas are correct, out of our net and the willingness of our supporters to sacrifice - no doubt.

The main factor of the world's greatest revolutions have always been oral, not written word. Orator speaking in front of masses, reads on the faces of the audience, she understood what he says, how she sympathizes with him. The audience immediately makes known to the amendments to what the speaker said. Between the speaker and his audience there is a known contact. Nothing like this can tell about yourself a writer. He his readers for the most part never even sees. For this reason alone, the writer inevitably gives to his writings a completely General form. Before his eyes there is the audience he would have seen directly. This inevitably deprives the printed word sufficient flexibility, sufficient understanding psychological nuances. A brilliant orator by rule, and not a bad writer, and a brilliant writer will never be speaker, unless he specifically practiced in this art.

You can even set a law by which only those successes were the most durable and great in history, who first met the least understanding of the crowd for the first details of the new proposal was in complete contradiction to the understanding of the masses, to its desires and opinions.

How little now I think about such requirements of ordinary decency, can be judged already because of how low the level of those crappy actors who nowadays feel called "to do politics". Many are called, but few are chosen.

Our army is fostered in the people a spirit of determination such a time when a sign of the times was a lack of commitment and eternal vibrations.
The army taught that a certain order is always better than a complete lack of solid guidance.