Author of quotes: Evgeny Spitsyn



For 30 years we have been treading water, we are all promised some breakthrough technologies, millions of jobs, and none of this. Stalin in 10 years turned peasant Russia into an industrial power and the second power of the world. Then in four years he won the hardest war, and then also restored the economy. Unemployment was eliminated, the largest scientific centers, tens of thousands of industrial enterprises were created, there was a constant increase in the welfare of Soviet citizens, not a handful of billionaires, but namely tens and hundreds of millions of people. For the first time in the world, a universal system of full-fledged secondary education and retraining of personnel was created. Even after putting housing into operation, we cannot catch up with the Soviet Union. In the Soviet Union, more than 100 million square meters of housing were built per year, and 99.9% of this housing was free. Now it's the opposite.
№ 426474   Added MegaMozg 25-08-2021 / 13:57
Finally finished off the Stalinist economic model so praised by liberals Kosygin economic reforms. In it was based on the profit as the main indicator of the effectiveness of economic growth.
№ 395103   Added MegaMozg 16-05-2020 / 13:03
For many years I sincerely believed that Gorbachev as leader of the state became a victim of circumstances. But when I began to write the fourth volume of his book and began to examine archival materials, and I came across including memoirs of Alexander Nikolayevich Yakovlev to Gorbachev and resolution of Mikhail Sergeyevich on the notes, and when I met with a number of work colleagues, I clearly understood that Gorbachev is not a victim of circumstances, and the real Creator of these circumstances and all the years of his leadership of the Soviet government, he deliberately led to destruction of the Soviet socialist system together Yakovlev, Medvedev, Chernyaev and others from his inner circle.
№ 395102   Added MegaMozg 16-05-2020 / 13:00
Whoever came to power, in addition to Gorbachev, I think, the Soviet Union, he would not miss, the same Yeltsin, for example, with his animal instinct of power. Gorbachev himself, as a figure, was so weak that he was simply unable to cope with the situation. There are no objective prerequisites for the collapse of the Soviet Union was not. This is pure man-made action of some of the political and military elite of the country.
№ 394881   Added MegaMozg 14-05-2020 / 19:36
When did the rampant selling of theses right and left, I realized that now the possession thesis is more a minus than a plus, that is a devalued brand. With rare exceptions there are now and candidates of Sciences and doctors of Sciences, who are really devotees of science, the devaluation of it all so devastating that I would rather have the diploma with honors of the Soviet University, the current thesis.
№ 394567   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 18:00
That's why the Soviet Union collapsed, because of career aspirations, many have joined the party, wearing the party ticket, and in essence were certainly not Communists.
№ 394563   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 17:48
Khrushchev was a staunch anti-Stalinist, he just wanted to wear a hat Stalin himself, so he wanted to put in the place of one of the cult of personality another, a cult of personality.
№ 394560   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 17:39
To call the period of the Khrushchev thaw, well, certainly not. It was the slush that, like rust, eaten whole Soviet system, the entire party-state apparatus, and as a result we ended up with nothing.
№ 394557   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 17:30
Any promotion of the power is a matter of chance.
№ 394556   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 17:27
The quality of administrative and political elite largely depends on understanding these people of historical processes.
№ 394555   Added MegaMozg 12-05-2020 / 17:24
The relationship between leaders, governments, States, personal relationships play an important role in how moving historical process.
№ 393630   Added Viker 07-05-2020 / 10:16
In the Soviet economy, of course, was the crisis elements, but they were structural in nature, not systemic; they are different things. That is the system itself the Soviet economy was quite competitive. This was recognized even by the leaders of the West: Reagan and Thatcher.
№ 393629   Added Viker 07-05-2020 / 10:16
In the April theses Lenin stated: "Our main goal is not the introduction of socialism at once, but only the establishment of workers 'control over social production and public distribution".
The bourgeoisie was suggested this compromise, but in November 1917 he issued a decree on workers ' control, the bourgeoisie began to organize lockouts and sabotage all decisions of the Soviet government. The Bolsheviks went on the red guard attack on capital, it was a necessary measure.
№ 393628   Added Viker 07-05-2020 / 10:16
The Bolsheviks, when they came to power, they issued a decree about branch of Church from the school and from the state. That's all. For more they did not claim. It is then the priests themselves largely provoked the Bolsheviks to tougher measures.
№ 393627   Added Viker 07-05-2020 / 10:16
With the departure of Stalin, everything was downhill, because it came to power, Khrushchev, who became the spokesman of interests of a certain part of the party-state apparatus, which is the model of the Soviet project and the hard work was not to their liking. They wanted to relax and live happily. It was the pace of the reaction.
№ 393414   Added MegaMozg 07-05-2020 / 04:15