the court [Theme] Page 4

How am I to judge you now? If to judge according to the laws, so there are lots of laws... And the laws are strict. So, dear friends, as you wish: if I judge you according to the laws, or like me God on heart believe?

The longer a person is dead, the more we tend to distort its strengths and weaknesses: he doesn't answer, but because we judged boldly.

There is a girl eh away if they told the truth the wise man?
Ripe cucumber on the field...
We sage - the cucumber, the damsel - in-interest entity,
Sin the beginning, truth the end.
Oh, I have sinned well you little trouble -
To create a household atmosphere.
Because the mouth breathers here and there, stare, walk and scurry,
Ripe, in our hands.
Yes, sin is guilty only in the fact that we call sin.
So there is no sin on him and not care.
And, so as not to grieve later, time to share experiences,
Besides, who wants to rule all.
And that means we need to water the field...

Who has not sinned God, the king, not the defendant.

I killed people, a lot of people, but they were all bad.

A date with the judge helped him to establish two things: first, that his client was a figurehead and that the process really boils down to the fight between the thieves; and secondly, that he has no guarantee at any time not to be thrown overboard.

I remember what I have been remorse, after I graduated from College. My head was full of beautiful aphorisms of the old Professor of ethics. And here I was taken to the legal Department of the new York guzikowski railway. We discussed a lawsuit for damages, and the old Henry Corbin, the General counsel of that road, passed me, and then took from his Desk the typewritten list of members of the state Supreme court. "Some of the names - he said - is marked with a red pencil may refer the matter to any of them: they are our people." Just think! And I was innocent as svezhevylupivshiysya chicken.

Fraud has now allowed such roots, which went to court, you can win almost any case. There are people who have dedicated all their time to seek out things and to fabricate testimony.

The activities of the court in the Russian Federation took the form of a joke: "the dispute is seen", you need a suit, but as a result of the lawsuit decided that there is no dispute. What's the appeal in form if the court acts in the form of a joke?

The court's decision must be issued in the name of exercising rights and freedoms, not the name of the Russian Federation.

Legislation should be the voice of reason, and the judge - the voice of the law.

Pride is good in its place. But the court is no place for its demonstration.

I don't look at hearing pessimistic but self-deception is not good.

The analyst Fedor Krasheninnikov cited for insulting the government, for the post about the judges. How can you insult the Russian judges who daily fact of its work offend the faith in the law, justice and all light and good, absolutely incomprehensible.