lose [Theme] Page 3

Only those who have drunk the bitter cup of war are worthy of becoming a military commander and leading soldiers to their death. Because he knows the price of defeat and victory.

The United States, each time “doubling the stake”, that is, trying during the next crisis not only to win back the losses of the previous one, but also to win an unconditional victory, brought the confrontation with Russia to a level where defeat for both sides (not only for Moscow, but also for Washington) means not just a loss of face or a loss of status, but the destruction of statehood, at least in its current form. The last doubling of the stakes occurred in 2013, when the US and the EU provoked an armed coup in Kyiv, sanctified the rise to power in Ukraine of outright Nazis and Russophobes with their recognition, and entered into a confrontation with Moscow in the zone of its vital interests. This is an undisguised invasion, which until 1945 and the advent of such a deterrent as nuclear weapons, would have been unambiguously regarded as a casus belli.

When you are dead tired, defeat is no longer so undesirable.

America was defeated in Afghanistan, the graveyard of empires, the next military adventure of the American regime is an attack on Russia in the winter ... Great ... For this tweet, I was ranked among the critics of Joe Biden and blamed for my connection with the Kremlin and my such a deep understanding of the Russian tradition and stories.

The most desperate, the most wrong spectacle in the world: motherhood, doomed to defeat.

The peaks, their very height, amaze with thunder.

There is only victory or defeat.

My defeat is a victory for others!

In general, I think that war is inevitable. I agree that this is an attempt to create a bipolar world. After the hardest defeat in Afghanistan, after all, it is obvious that this is a defeat, the Americans must somehow restore their military authority. the only option I see is the use of nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear country. Obviously, Iran is the most convenient and safest target for this. I hope I'm wrong, but how else can they restore their military credibility?

This is not an attempt to create a new world order based on some kind of peaceful solution. This is an attempt to threaten and move towards conflict. If they don't understand this, it suggests that the concept is failing.

One can learn about one's mistakes and weaknesses only from defeats.

There is only victory and defeat, the winner gains moral superiority because he writes history, and the loser simply loses.

No, Kafka is not passivity, rather the opposite: a heightened awareness of activity, activism, frantic vitality, resourcefulness, the energy of evil. Good is not absent, but it is too puny and lifeless to enter into battle on equal terms. His defeat in a mass society is inevitable. The entire history of mass societies is the history of his defeat.

If I play, no matter what match ... We won or lost, the responsibility lies with me! I lead the team to victory! Well, to defeat too! In short, I'm the best here!