equality [Theme] Page 3

Three concepts - Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, coming from a spiritual source - the French revolution brought to one plane; it was materialistic distortion and naturally led to social chaos in which we now are. Because these three ideas belong to three different areas of life: freedom of the spiritual life, equality - state-legal, fraternity and economic.

The absolute can only be spiritual equality!

Stupider just behaves stupid woman demanding equality with an intelligent man.
And only stupid women and demand equality.

And you in the trenches will share who is noble and who is not?

Question: Since men are equal before the law of God, then should they be equal before the law human?
Answer: This is the first Foundation of justice is: "do Not do to others what you would not want yourself".
Question: In agreement with this it turns out that all legislation, to be completely fair, should consecrate the equality of rights between man and woman?
Response: rights - Yes; responsibilities - no. Everyone went about their business; let the man engaged an external party, the woman internal, each according to his inclination. Human law, to be fair, should consecrate the equality of rights between man and woman; every advantage provided to one before the other, disgusted of justice. The liberation of women follows the progress of civilization; her enslavement is in hand with barbarism. The floors, however, exist only in physical organization; because the spirits can take one gender or another, between them there is no difference in this respect, and therefore they should enjoy the same rights.

Some wise man said that the idle and industrious in equal death, so why try? Will he lie or rush, the result is the same.

Question: Two mutually sympathetic spirit do complement one spirit to another, or sympathy this is the result of their new identities?
Answer: the Sympathy that attracts one spirit to another, is the result of perfect coordination tendencies; if one served to complement another, each of them would lose their individuality.
Question: Identity, necessary for sympathetic spirits, whether expressed only in the similarity of thoughts and feelings, or even in odinakovoi acquired knowledge?
Answer: In the same degree of development.

- Uh, what are you a Communist?!
- It's only fair to share the food.
- They at the top do not need the Communists.

Some of the beliefs associated with democracy, have blatant flaws. First and foremost is the position that everyone should be equal - both men and women. On this rests the formula of "one person - one vote". But is this equality possible? Sometimes over-zealous belief in universal equality can lead to regression. Let me give a simple example. If the one world government will be led by our close and associated to the node world, does it help the system of "one person - one vote"? All will be immediately obvious: a developed and educated part of the nation will be buried under the votes of the poor and uneducated, which will make impossible any progress.

If we believe in human dignity and his right to be free, if we value human life regardless of skin color and religion, then we must fight with a fatal indifference, based on the assertion that the ancient savage and modern man in the end are nothing more than animals, capable only to defend their own interests, ignoring the rights and - worst of all - life other members of their race. As social Democrats we have abandoned the claim that the rich should become richer and the poor to beg. We fight economic and social injustice and provide equal rights to all.

From the beginning we sought to build a more just and equitable society. We understood that absolute equality is unattainable in principle. People are born with different abilities. And they are always ready to compete. The Communist system in the Soviet Union and China failed because of the attempts to equalize all salaries. As a result, nobody worked in full force, although all wanted to if not more at least not less than others. Socialist egalitarianism managed to harm even the UK economy and the European Union, where workers wanted to work less and get more.

In any society a thousand newborns have how much that genius, as some children of average ability and some are weak. Forgive me if I get too involved with the care of these almost geniuses, but I am convinced that it is from them our future depends. In any society sets the tone of one who is above average. Yes, we are committed to equality. And I want to give equal opportunities to everyone. And yet deep down we understand that no two people completely equal in strength, talent and ability, persistence and the hidden advantages. And I'm always interested in how to give the best education to him who is able to make a real contribution to the development of our country.

- Equality is still not the most important.
- And I thought - thing, ' said Jane. - Because people are, in fact, equal.
- You were wrong - he said seriously. - That in essence they are not equal. They are equal before the law, and it was good. Equality protects them, but does not create. It's a medicine, not food.

That's what true love is. This unity and equal opportunities for everyone.