the leader [Theme] Page 2

- Leader of the sect.

A leader for that and a leader that should be fair.

When a leader changes, people don't know what to do.

One who has not learned to obey cannot be a good leader.

People's instincts are built to imitate a leader. There is nothing you can do about it.

If the leader wants trust, power and gain, then he will give all this as much as he wants.

Leaders become stronger from betrayal.

The leader is the one who is willing to make any sacrifice to get a new friend.

Here is Vladimir, and here is the antithesis - another Vladimir, who in October 1917, the year became the head of an absolutely devastated country, where there is a "molecular" civil war, banditry, terrorism, in which the economy is nothing, in which most of the territory given to the enemy, he creates the state. Lenin is the man who out of chaos created the state, which was hard enough, but it was hard just the same as the father's violence against children. Therefore, the more Putin will be in power, the more real the image of the other Vladimir. They contradict each other, they like philosophy dichotomous pair: Lenin is the man who out of chaos creates reality, Putin is the man who reality turns into chaos, the chaos of capitalism, the chaos of infinite crisis. So, naturally, even unconsciously, without even reading Lenin, not even realizing Lenin, instinct people will seek to Lenin.

For many years I sincerely believed that Gorbachev as leader of the state became a victim of circumstances. But when I began to write the fourth volume of his book and began to examine archival materials, and I came across including memoirs of Alexander Nikolayevich Yakovlev to Gorbachev and resolution of Mikhail Sergeyevich on the notes, and when I met with a number of work colleagues, I clearly understood that Gorbachev is not a victim of circumstances, and the real Creator of these circumstances and all the years of his leadership of the Soviet government, he deliberately led to destruction of the Soviet socialist system together Yakovlev, Medvedev, Chernyaev and others from his inner circle.

A political leader makes a name for first, the ability to manage the entrusted power in the interest of the people, and secondly, the way it shapes the succession to the government in the future are also concerned about the interests of the people, thirdly, the ability to honorably resign and give place to another.

I have never met a man who became a leader only because he followed the leading of the course.

Organized by the people wins the war, disorganized is the crowd that showed Russia in the First world war. Well, the fact that the defeat in the war contrary to the commander in chief - it's all nonsense, which even hard to discuss.

Brothers Matranga also made the discovery that they had already made Esposito - that few people possess such a quality as dominance, can lead to a great mass of people, this quality of non. In those days, the zoologists knew very little about the phenomenon "dominance" among the animals and, naturally, heard nothing about that approximately 5% of individuals of all flocks it seeks to dominate. Most of us assumes (and rightly so) that most of the human beings appreciates its independence and in any case will be to defend it, and there is no doubt that all animals, including humans, are in a fierce struggle to protect their right to "territory".
But just as certainly, and more among each of the 20 randomly bystanders must be allocated a leader, able to impose their will on the rest 19.