TV show: Evening with Vladimir Solovyov. Page 5

Finally etcawed the creation of some ideology in 1991. Moreover, it was forbidden that there was an ideology in the country. But there can be no country of such size with such a diverse population, with such a diversity of cultures and religions, a single country, if it does not have a common ideology. People are united by common spiritual values. You can't build a country on profit and money. Speculators do not create an ideology.

I will emphasize again. Until we say in the ideological thesis that defines the framework of all educational activities in the country that the student is the main person in the educational process, we will not be able to establish the educational process in essence. There will be - the provision of services, the sale of teaching qualifications in the form of tutoring, the absence of education, because education outside the structure of authority is, in principle, impossible. It is possible to educate only with the relation of authority and student, rigidly fixed. If this is not the case, there will be no upbringing. And our main ideology is still about personality. I just want to ask a question. Those who argue that it is necessary to cultivate a personality. Are you saying that there are personalities and there are non-personalities? This is an extremely racist thesis. We'll be raising some individuals, and with the rest, what are you going to do? Is it their fate? But this is still a dogma. Ideological dogma in relation to education.

Stalingrad is not only Stalin's city. This is a symbol of Russia. Symbols cannot be misinterpreted.

About Macron. I would recommend Mr. Macron to read a very good novel by the Strugatsky brothers, "It's Hard to be a God." Just on this topic. Let me remind you: the plot of a fantastic novel is that in the future, on a planet where society is in the Middle Ages, our cosmonauts arrive from an advanced communist society, and the meaning of their activities is not to interfere in anything. Even if they see the crime, torture, executions, atrocities of this society. The heroes of this novel acted very correctly.

The army is primarily an ideology. And the spirit of the warrior is determined, of course, first of all by faith in the cause that he represents and in the country that he defends.

Or the question of our poverty. Where is the growth of the economy? Question to the deputies: when will you raise the issue of the law on the Central Bank? Which should become a sovereign Central Bank.

- Yes, not in a hurry. If we understand where all this is going, we will always be in time. But we can only stake on understanding. The real, real resource for this situation where no one knows what to do is understanding and thinking. The consequence of understanding and thinking should be inner stability and unity.

In my opinion, Russia remains an empire. It's just that empires are in different stages. For example, Russia is no longer an expanding empire. Russia holds its territories. Such periods were in the history of every empire. The problem of Russia in the 90s was precisely that the political elite in those years canceled this idea. She announced that Russia is not an empire, and partly convinced the population of this. But the historical logic still remains. It turned out that Russia is acting and determines the imperial policy. And Putin is now rebuilding the empire. Empires are different. There are purely colonial empires such as Britain and Portugal. There are ideocratic empires like Russia. And this should be studied. In the 90s, we were declared a nation state, but this is not so. The nation state and the empire have completely different policies. The negative attitude towards the empire remained from V.I. Lenin, who crossed out the empire. But empires have done many good things throughout history. These are not just conquests. This is the development of culture and communications. It's time to remove the stigma from the empire and understand yourself.

This is the real creative historical task. That russian imperialism did not exist at the expense of the Russian national. Because if the Russian nationality disappears, then there will be no place for Russian imperialism.

In Russia, the Russian national struggles with the Russian imperial. Russian national is Russian egoistic. That we have to separate ourselves from everything, take care of ourselves. This can be understood, because the Russian people gave the empire a lot of strength. Russian imperialism speaks of the universality inherent in the Russian people, the ability to unite other peoples, to give other peoples a common goal with themselves and to be together with other peoples. This is a key issue that the Russians cannot solve today. Are Russians and Ukrainians one people? I think that for many Ukrainians this is not very acceptable. Ukrainians feel like an independent people. How do you find the ideology you need to unite? It is clear that it is necessary to unite the Eastern Slavs. But it is necessary to unite not only the Eastern Slavs, it is necessary to unite the Slavs with the Eastern Turks. Only in the Eurasian space is the survival of the Russian people possible. If the Russian people withdraw into themselves, they will lose allies.

Which did not allow the deep, archaic people to realize. At that moment, the popular self-image was triggered. And this people, who gave great gunsmiths, and the younger generation, and the guys who continued to believe in the army, and the guys who continued to study and win Olympiads,

The topic today is difficult. Because we are all, to some extent, the fruits of 91. And we all bear this trauma of zeroing everything that came before. It was not even dismantling, but zeroing. We were told that nothing had happened before. Everything before that had been declared the Dark Ages. We must clearly understand that the people who drape the mausoleum every year would like to drape the entire Soviet period. Because if it opens, the question will arise: who are they? Who are these marauders who seized pieces of property, most of them could not manage them normally. Here, either they will reset the Soviet period, or the Soviet period will reset them. The contradiction here is antagonistic.

S. V. Lavrov is a great diplomat, and it is not for me to put the word across. But I cannot agree with his thesis that people are born with patriotism. They are not born with patriotism. They grow up with patriotism. And if there is no patriotism in the family, if there is no patriotism at school, if in society the word patriotism is associated with a backward conservative ideology, and children grow up listening to this, well, what kind of patriots will they be?

Nikolay (Zlobin), look at the structure of the Russian industry. We got off the oil needle for a long time. And by the way, as Nature magazine wrote today, they have to admit that the Russian Sputnik vi vaccine is really good, effective and safe.