nationality [Theme]

Koreans know how to rejoice like children, but in grief they are silent and unapproachable.

- Damn it! “They live like the most backward nationality,” Pavel Mokhov was indignant. - If you look at it from a bird's eye view...

An unsympathetic but good person is like an ugly but charming dog named Tuna. She was born with a terrible upper jaw and an unusually “trimmed” lower jaw, but turned out to be a wonderful, pleasant, friendly and kind companion. Such a dog has many good qualities, among which there is fidelity and cheerfulness. We do not choose our appearance, nationality, or voice, and even more so a jaw with strong teeth. What is given to us by nature is inherent in our destiny. And fate, as you know, can not escape. Remember: to make fun of an unpleasant appearance, no matter whether a person or a dog, and in general over everything that is inherent in nature, is unworthy and ugly.

If an athlete is a person, nationality does not matter!

If the French were German by nature, how would the Germans then admire them.

This is the real creative historical task. That russian imperialism did not exist at the expense of the Russian national. Because if the Russian nationality disappears, then there will be no place for Russian imperialism.

And note that as soon as after times and centuries (because there is also its own law, unknown to us) began to loosen and weaken in this nationality its spiritual ideal, so immediately began to fall and nationality, and together fell and all its civil charter, and faded all those civil ideals that had time to develop in it.

He's not some Tajik to you. He is a human.

- Jews don't change their faith! By wetting his head, Jesus did not wash the Jew out of himself. Nationality doesn't dissolve in water, Mortle. This is your skin, from birth to death. Well, and religion, say, is a coat. It gets too hot, take it and take it off.

ᅠ People were exterminated for their nationality. Burned to the ground. However, has something changed in the twenty-first century? No. No one else drives Jews into gas chambers, but ethnic discrimination and religious intolerance have not been eradicated, and it will hardly ever be possible to do this - this is the very weed whose shoots, if not weeded, will certainly hatch. Moreover, children of celebrities also experience this pressure, for they are fortunate enough to belong to the dynasty of the "Chosen" - they are disliked for the fact of life. As, in principle, and the heirs of the heads of the special forces.

The UN and UNESCO classify cultural monuments as the heritage of mankind. Not the property of any one nation, one country, one continent. No - as a heritage of mankind.
I am in support of Genghis Khan, or Rolf pedestrian, or Ragnar Leather pants, or Cortez, or any other such figure - they were the property of neither the Spaniards, nor the Mongols, the Norwegians. And the heritage of mankind.
Because it's like the question "who are the best warriors in Genghis Khan's army?" - yes, those who fight well. All.
And Cortez, and Genghis Khan, and Gandhi are the same - all these are personalities. What makes them so - their nationality? That Gandhi is Indian and Cortez is Spanish? - Nope. What they do is that they are Gandhi and Cortez. Just like that.
Therefore, they are like Angkor - Wat, like magnificent multi-meter Buddhas carved from stone, like things from ancient Roman or ancient Greek heritage, like Karnak, like Baalbek. Is it all Greek, Roman, Syrian heritage? - It's a human heritage.
This is not Genghis Khan, who belongs only to the Mongols or Kazakhs, or even only to the Genghisids.
No, Genghis Khan is a universal human heritage. Like Louis 14, like Nero, oddly enough.
I believe that this is what gives our civilization a chance to remain a civilization of people, not pithecanthropes.
And this is a small but very important change in my head. The little switch is , "And we're all human and we have a common heritage."
Here's this change in the head - either humanity makes it, or it goes to (as Carl, the hero of "Trinkets" from the 13th century would say) on the horned one.
And then they will fight each other like in the Stone Age. Thinking:
"What are these strange things so flat? But nothing, if you hit this angle of this strange flat black crap, so you can kill"
That's how people will use iPads.
And not in 1000 years, but in a hundred or two. So we're either making this change in consciousness or it's a grave. And nothing better then, except for this, such an angry, petty, tiny, grumpy humanity is not worthy.
Let's end on a nice note. Total:
Thinking in countries is not something that, last century, this is the century before last. When you have 7 billion, you need a different mindset. You need to think:
"We are all human. And anyone can be whatever they want. You can be born in Japan and fall in love with Norwegian culture and yes, play Vikings. You can be born in Norway and fall in love with Angkor Wat. And it's great to dance these complex Khmer dances better than people who were born in Cambodia. Therefore, let everyone be everything they want to be and everything they love.
And any great personalities, any great buildings - the property of each of us as long as we are people, not worms. "

- It is given?
He's dead Dan, so good Dan.

The crazies are everywhere. Nothing to do with nationality

If one boxer nationality does not matter!