sociology [Theme]

We talked about sociologists yesterday. And recently Jacob Kedmi sent me a funny picture. I thought she was very close to the concept of a sociologist. 5 out of 6 scientists believe that Russian roulette is absolutely safe. This is how sociologists conduct a survey. 5 out of 6 respondents are sure that Russian roulette is absolutely safe. Therefore - beware of opinion polls, illiterately formulated and politicized presented. Therefore, if you are interested in sociology, do not contact foreign agents.

We all like a world where beings are developed enough to make a strict social hierarchy feel like equality. We all want a world where you can genuinely respect your neighbor because your neighbor deserves it. He does not claim your respect with empty stink, when he does not even deserve a stake, and he is capable of warmth, is not afraid of warmth and is open to you as you are open to him. We all want a world inhabited by worthy creatures. Only I can't see how a division by nationality can lead to this. And if you will allow me, I believe that the time when you set laws only for your kingdom is far in the past. Even in the thirteenth century, this was no longer the case. Today, when we have transatlantic telephones, airplanes, radio, cinema, you have to set moral laws for humanity as a whole. The Fuehrer is actively working with Japan. The Japanese are also nationalists. They, too, are convinced that the superior race should be no more than sixty meters tall, moon-faced, narrow-eyed and black with hair, that coal. Blacks say, you're very good for white. Everyone is Nazis and racists. Everyone is every human being, because every wader will scream that his swamp is not the only one not a swamp. If you want to be above it all, you have to be different from them. They have to measure themselves by you, they won't do it if you're the same wader who just as hysterically praises his swamp.

Remember: you cannot successfully communicate with beings whose eyes you to look at the world not able.
Franz Wertvollen "Vaccine from Idiocracy"

In science, when is human behavior, things become nonlinear. That's why simple physics, and sociology are complex.

After all, democracy is alien to Ukrainians phenomenon. People unbearable to live in, when by election day, it is not solved. It is much easier to accept the fact that you know what will happen tomorrow. We first want to change, then again, we get used to stability. And go through the rings of the spiral from election to election.

The reformers - idealists movable purely Marxist idea of domination of economic laws over sociopolitical and administrative realities, have created conditions to release the social groups generated by a real socialism, from the bondage of any law.

To watch people so despise them that deprive themselves of the opportunity to understand them; to understand them, we must live with them, despising their way of life, and not their own.

We must not forget that we, as an oil-producing country and a country that has a major income from the sale of oil and gas, we have also so-called non-oil deficit. That is what turns a country from sales of oil and gas. And let me remind you that in 2009 it amounted to, in my opinion, in the area of 13 percent. That's a lot. In the early 2000s, he was about three, and then, due to the economic global crisis, I want to stress that we were forced to spend petrodollars in order to fulfill their social obligations to the people, to sustain the construction plans of the Armed Forces, and spending petrodollars.

Intellectual, and highly active sociopath like complexity, but not stupidity. The shortest path to the goal - always straight, it is curved from having to follow someone else's interests, and the more the interests of the people you consider, the more the path to the predicted result, the less chances of success.

... the collapse of the Soviet Union and, as a consequence, the fact that today in America is called "victory in the cold war", was the result of a fatal error that led to the crisis of ideology. And it all began not with the advent to power of Mikhail Gorbachev declared perestroika and the advent of "new thinking". It began, oddly enough, from the perspective of the founder of the Soviet state Vladimir Lenin.
The fact that the state model, which is found in the land of the Soviets the Bolsheviks after the Civil war, did not imply a number of crucial institutions required for a full life of any normal society. Political science and sociology as a science did not really exist; the philosophy was clearly a pen - philosophers trying to think broadly, at best dismissed, at worst were sent to places not so remote. Plus, within the Soviet society, in principle, there was no debate on the most pressing issues.

In the twentieth century the metaphor of the theatre was constructed such discipline as sociology.

I'm not very interesting "normal". If you want to get an idea of the temperament, moral principles and education is your friend, you have to see it in exceptional circumstances, not rosy everyday. Can you assess the danger posed by the offender, by observing its behavior in a typical day? Can we understand what health, turning a blind eye to the terrible disease and epidemics? The norm often is not important at all.

The trouble all sorts of social scientists in that they study people as a group of people, and it is not so. People - it's the same beast. And human it is not more than the dog.

Sociology is the science with the maximum set of methods and minimum results.