market [Theme] Page 2

90 per cent of all feeble-minded, third-rate it, just nonsense. Plug your ears if the market yells too loudly, and walk away. The market is not an indicator of the importance, value and good quality of such things.

When Gorbachev was enacted two laws that destroyed the country. The law on individual labor activity, which legalized the underground economy. And the law on individual enterprise, which has destroyed the consumer market. This meant the beginning of a systemic crisis.

The world economy is not a perfect free market, where everyone's waiting for you and want you to compete fairly. This is an area in which "developed" countries are constantly pressured through political, non-market instruments on an "undeveloped" country, so they have remained undeveloped. They strongly interfere with the development of education, science, high-tech production in the "developing" countries.

It is hardly surprising that in a culture where the prevailing market orientation and where material success is the outstanding value of human love relations follow the same patterns that drive the market.

The desire of the new York women to get into the market of brides of the nineteenth century seems amazing. In the end, the emancipation of women in Manhattan has gone further than any other city in the world. Ladies can not call themselves "feminists", but if they think they were discriminated against, immediately rushed to dial a phone number of his lawyer. They are more ambitious, better educated and less depressed compared to previous generations of women, and yet are willing to do anything to get a husband. Why? The answer is simple - to impress other women.

The market is not only profit, it necessarily ruin and loss. If the market is not those who are ruined, "going to hell" or blows his brains out from the fact that he had nothing to pay off debts, or goes into debt, it is not a market, this is something completely different.

Capitalism is a capital market is a market that is not in the interests of the masses and small businesses. This is the market that works to the owners of large fortunes.

The market over time tends to monopolize. And the government has got to do with it. It can only speed up or slow down this process. But the source of the monopoly competition. Over time as a result of competition, inefficient businesses go bankrupt and more efficient - become larger, capturing a market share of bankrupt.

The market has one advantage over a planned economy. The market is growing itself, and requires no maintenance. In this it is similar to weed. A planned economy is necessary to build and take care of her, as a cultural plant.

The state will always intervene in the management of the market, because the market itself is very fragile to imbalances. This imbalance of overproduction and inequality. It is impossible to ensure economic growth without reducing inequality. It is impossible to stimulate demand, if a large part of the income you spend big capital then it appears abroad.

Even in the early class societies have limited relations of slavery, limited the possibility of recourse to the slavery of freemen, so as not to undermine the social fabric of society. Some of the first social guarantees were established with the institution of the state. This was done not because the government cared about the lives of ordinary people, and being a tool in the hands of the ruling class, it ensures the preservation of the object of operation. Here, too, the state with the position of capitalism is an important task not to destroy the market, not to give, say, a break to all the flock, which actively "cut the hair" of world capitalism.

The Soviet Union is to criticize. And the Communists first, who wants to show the contradictions of this system, which became the first in history to attempt the construction of the future society. But in the course of controversy with the authors of the film "death of the Empire" I want to ask: "are you ready to admit that the market reforms of the 90s and a return to capitalism could not solve literally any problem of Soviet society and added a new one?"
The shortage of goods has resulted in inflation and decline in the quality of the products on the background of falling production. Scarce are now a roof over your head, a decent education and medical services. The "iron curtain" is no more, but seventy of the population not only does not have a passport, but cannot go to relatives in former Soviet republics due to the growth of Russophobia and political strife. Market not only increased the competitiveness of domestic goods, but they do not destroy whole sectors of the Russian economy; not only reduced dependence on oil but also turned the country into a raw material periphery. Capitalism not only created nothing new, but continues to parasitize on the old material database. But instead of investing in national production of hundreds of billions of dollars of exports abroad, the national wealth of our people.

Market provokes the situation when will not deceive - will not sell.

Supply and demand - always a major problem for business. This was true since the days when Phoenician traders were in a hurry to deliver to Rome purple to dye fabric from which sewed gowns for royalty and the rich; purple all the time is not enough.
It is difficult to invent, and to manufacture the product and find a market, but there is still logistics, mechanics, hydraulics how to deliver this product to those who are waiting for him and when his waiting - that's what die company