property [Theme] Page 2

- How is that why? x2 Fuck knows why. Let's better ask an intelligent person.

(I'm greedy Grid! Money, women, servants! They are all mine! All mine!)

This type of sights on the most sacred thing we have! On the Constitution! It reads: "Every person has the right to personal property. It is protected by the law." Everyone has the right to have a car, a dacha, books... money! Comrades, the money still has not been canceled. From each according to his ability, to each according to his labor in cash.

The fate of everything in the eternal property.

Looking at the "virgin of the rocks", the visitor of the National gallery (thanks to all that he heard and read about this picture) would feel about the following: "I stand in front of her. I can see it. This painting by Leonardo is not like any other painting in the world. The National gallery stored its original. If I'm diligent enough to look at her, you can sense its authenticity. "Madonna of the rocks" Leonardo da Vinci: it is authentic and therefore beautiful!"
To reject such feelings as naive would be wrong. They correspond to a complex view of specialists in the art, to which is written the catalogue of the National gallery. An article about "the virgin of the rocks" one of the longest in it. It is fourteen pages in small print. And not a word about the meaning of this picture. It tells about who ordered this picture, on the legal disputes about who she belonged to, about the probable date of its creation, the families of its owners. For this information there are years of researches, aimed to dispel the slightest doubt that this picture really painted by Leonardo. The second goal is to prove that is almost identical to the picture stored in the Louvre is a copy that hangs in the National gallery.
French art historians try to prove the opposite.

Gorbachev was put forward that part of the Soviet nomenklatura, the Soviet secret police, who decided to become owners. Americans accelerated this process, bringing down the oil and as if pushing these guys.

Why save the good in the desert of life?
Who always lived among us? Such I had not seen.
Because life we are in debt is given, and the time is short.
And the fact that this debt, not the property of yours.

- You do not pay taxes!
- How? Here. For land, for water.
- And for snow?
- And for snow. That week paid.
- It's the New year? So for last year's snow! But for this one?

Becoming, finally, a valid representative of the whole society, it becomes redundant. When there is no public classes that need to hold in subjection, when there is no domination of one class over another and of the struggle for existence, rooted in the modern anarchy of production, when will be removed the ensuing clashes and violence, then there will be no one to suppress and deter, then disappear the need for state power, is now performing this function. The first act in which the state will act as a valid representative of the whole society - the circulation of the means of production into public property, - will be its last independent act as state. The intervention of state power in social relations becomes little by little an excessive and will stop by itself. In place of the control persons becomes the administration of things and the management of production processes. The state is not "abolished", it dies.

Jealousy is not a proof of love, proof of the rights owner. Only here the other person is not home, his property will not take.

Socialism is not state property, but it cannot be without state ownership.

Socialism is not about how to select and divide, but to unite, integrate resources and to use them for the benefit of the whole society. The idea is to separate and disassemble - it is just a bourgeois idea.

I will always be with you, but don't try to get the best of me, because property and love are incompatible.

This myth (that private property is better and more efficient that the government nothing but harm, to bring the economy can not, you need to ensure the freedom of prices, that it is necessary to link the issue of the national currency to buy the dollar) was implemented by the International monetary Fund for underdeveloped African countries that have had problems of repayment of loans: it was necessary to introduce external management, that is transfer of the economy under the control of Western corporations.