the Constitution [Theme]

do not prevent thousands of rocket explosions ...

If we have sinned, then let's bring the constitutional course.

We are worth...

There is no need for nafig here.

The people elect the president. And the people trust the president. Not that narrow cohort that you, IM, are trying to protect. And this is called the rule of the people. Because if no one elected the president, but he is elected directly, therefore, it is the president who is endowed with all the power. And the president every time, going to the elections, receives confirmation of his mandate. And this is called democracy. And what you, IM, are trying to suggest, is a cunning system of elite agreements. And the main thing is that in your definition of democracy you move away from the main question: is democracy an end or a means? And if you don't answer this question, you will never come to the truth. And you will be dragged along in the wagon train of Western political thought.

Did the people discuss the 1993 constitution? When was the parliament shot? In October? And when was the constitution adopted? December? What, from October to December, did you discuss it? I want to remind you so that you understand once and for all. You explain to the people where you put the bowels. It is necessary to defend the people, not the constitution. You, without any discussion, a number of those who took part in this execution and supported it, decided that you can impose will on the people. Only now are we gaining the sovereignty that we need in making amendments. Because you did it very quickly so that the people could not even count. Was that your yes-yes-no-yes vote? You voted with the entire list. You haven't reviewed every article. You set a precedent in 1993. You emasculated the 1993 constitution. There is no ideology, no God, no rights of the Russian person, no Russian language. You have taken away the bowels of the people. In that constitution, you gave priority to international law. And we, in spite of all your squeals, squeals and screams, returned a significant part to the constitution. And the attitude of the people to these creators of the constitution is obvious. Ask the people: do they consider them their heroes? As for the president, he realized that the 1993 constitution does not allow to correspond to the present moment. And there was an amendment.

Shcherbakov to tambi: There is a solution! If you have a body Constitution - it is possible to rewrite!
Tambi: I have found a small hole where the "Reset" push)

This type of sights on the most sacred thing we have! On the Constitution! It reads: "Every person has the right to personal property. It is protected by the law." Everyone has the right to have a car, a dacha, books... money! Comrades, the money still has not been canceled. From each according to his ability, to each according to his labor in cash.

We have proposed amendments in the Russian law over international on the territory of the Russian Federation. It is also very important. And this is also noted. Of course, they are trying to sabotage the Constitution by all possible means, vkidyvaya an incredible amount of money to work with the opposition. It is necessary to disrupt. Because Russia claims to have own position. And it immediately becomes a problem. And this must be addressed.

According to the article Nuland. A very interesting thing. Please note that the article was done around the amendments of the Constitution. Why? I think they knew what they were doing. This article in particular shows the contradictions that were uncovered by coronavirus. In fact, we saw a profound crisis of liberal ideas, where every man for himself. And here we see the amendments in the Constitution that say about the nationals. And compatriots is that? It's not just a citizen of Russia, every man for himself. Yes, he has rights. But compatriot as a group - this is Russian world. And it's scary.

The Constitution of the country - not grandfather's pants, to reshape it under his own ass. © Tigran Babayan

In my experience, the Constitution should be like a suit tailored exclusively to order, for the figure. Rather like the shoes, the longer you wear them the better they fit. Spread them, stretch them, replace the insole, to patch up - in any case, it's better than a new pair, even from the most prestigious brand. Our people are accustomed to the existing system. For its understanding it takes a long time - how to get rid of emphasis when learning Chinese. Any fundamental change takes time. But the Constitution is supposed to work is the most important. Many countries, barely after independence, to change the Constitution like a glove: moving from Prime Minister and parliamentary system to the presidential Board or to power of the military and again after election to the President or to the people's Republic, or the revolutionary junta. They never achieved stability or the legitimacy of the government. If we understand that the young generation needs a new style, I'm sure it would be better to stretch and straighten the old shoes. Only such changes will strengthen our future.

The failure of the Constitution and human rights, Putin is to blame the Constitution, because without amendments.

The Constitution is a fundamental document that is the Foundation on which to build laws. Think that amendments to substantive articles, which made President Putin, illegitimate. The President has no right to hold all three branches of government. In addition, the vote that triggers it, is also illegitimate. To enter into the Constitution of provisions of Federal law - nonsense!