the contract [Theme] Page 1

A free artist creates without a contract.

And only sadness and shame poured out.

Like many of her peers, Helen tormented herself with seasonal diets. Between her and her body, a kind of strange agreement was concluded, where self-restraint was a popular coin with which she paid for returning to her youth. Suffering - for vitality, hunger - for the smoothness of the skin, abstinence - for the fullness of life. True, to be honest, it turned out so-so.

In life, you have to pay for everything. But this is not a reason not to even bargain.

Any treaty is a peacetime treaty. War treaties have not stopped and cannot stop. With the outbreak of hostilities, all treaties go away. Treaties are needed to provide a certain predictability in order to realistically assess the potential of the enemy. And if there is no predictability, then either side tends to overestimate the opponent's capabilities. And this is the basis for an arms race. And she's already coming. I am sure that there is not a quantitative race going on, because it is pointless to destroy this land several times. A high-quality arms race is underway.

You cannot make concessions when there is a contract. If the contract is not followed, it will be violated.

Rules and treaties are a means, but not an end.

But again, the question arises: what does the Soviet Union have to do with it? Oh yes, on September 17, 1939, we also entered the territory of Poland, committing a terrible crime against the Polish statehood. What norms are we talking about at all? In this case, there are four of them: the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921, the Paris Briand-Kellogg Pact, the non-aggression pact between Poland and the USSR of 1932 and, finally, the Convention on the Definition of Aggression of 1933. Document titles are large-scale. And if you do not know what they contain, probably, you really just need to sprinkle ashes on your head, the whole country to fall to its knees and ask the proud Polish gentry to forgive us. But as soon as you open the first of these documents, it will immediately turn out that there is nothing to repent of, in general. And Poland, to put it mildly, distorts the cards. Let's start with the fundamental document in all this history - the Convention on the Definition of Aggression. Today, those Poles who call on the peoples of Russia to repent for 1939, for some reason forget to clarify that this document was proposed by Moscow, that is, the Soviet Union. The convention has an important point: "The invasion of its armed forces, at least without declaring war on the territory of another state." That is, the entry of troops of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus could be regarded as a violation. But this convention, despite all the proposals of Moscow, was never adopted, which means that it did not become a document of international law. This happened thanks to the position of Great Britain and France. And Poland was not eager to support this document. But that's half the trouble. The problem is that a convention cannot exist on its own. It was to be part of a thrice international agreement on arms limitation. You probably won't be surprised if I say that the agreement was not signed. That is, the Soviet Union is accused of violating the main provisions of international law, although these provisions are spelled out in documents that were not adopted, and at the same time proposed to adopt them by the USSR. Now let's turn to the Briand-Kellogg Pact, which the Soviet Union brazenly ignored in order to destroy Polish statehood. It has a clause condemning war as a means of settling international disputes. Awesome. Let's admit that there was indeed a misunderstanding between Moscow and Warsaw. So what happens? In September 1939, Germany attacks Poland, war begins, then Great Britain and France declare war on Germany. And then comes September 17, 1939. The Soviet Union introduces troops into the territory of Western Belarus, Western Ukraine. Did Great Britain and France declare war on the Soviet Union for violating the Briand-Kellogg Pact? Of course not. Let's ask a more complicated question: did Poland declare war on the Soviet Union? You will be surprised, but not only was war not declared on the Soviet Union, the Polish army was ordered categorically not to engage in hostilities with the troops of the Red Army. In other words, the Polish government then, in 1939, did not regard the entry of Red Army troops into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus as a violation of the Briand-Kellogg Pact. <... > And since the Briand-Kellogg Pact does not add up very well, they immediately occupy the following line of defense: the non-aggression pact between Poland and the Soviet Union of 1932 was violated. <... > The defeat of Poland in the war with Germany automatically meant the termination of the 1932 treaty. Agree, if one of the two partners by the standards of international law ceases to exist, how and at what expense should the treaty operate? For some reason, Polish political scientists and experts do not want to categorically talk about this. How they are not going to talk about the fact that the Soviet Union in the autumn of 1939 complied with absolutely all the norms of international law: the government of the USSR summoned the Polish ambassador in Moscow and notified him that in connection with the defeat of Poland in the war with the Third Reich, the 1932 treaty was now terminated.

- Violate the agreement? But what about the "bad guys forever"?
- Yes, but "forever" ended when you died.
What? What are you talking about, Bobby?
- You have three heart, Mike.
- Marcus, man, this bastard of me something lost and I'm back.
What is he robbed you, Mike? You're still alive. All he took is a legend of a bulletproof Vest, but I've seen you bleed. You're human, like everyone else.

- Who are you?! What kind of person? If you ever come near my family...
- What would you do? Well, what can you do?
- Don't touch my favorite!
- We're agreed there's no way back. If you run away again, and if you break the contract, do not obey me, then without warning and you will be prayed at the funeral of his brother. I won't touch you, so you're not worried about the pain from their mistakes. Take a good look in these eyes, is this pain worse than death, you know?
- You are not human. You have a dried up heart. You disgust me!
- I adore you.

Any peace Treaty has someone else's blood.

At least I don't cheat; because I can not, in so many cases, to make love seriously: why should I pretend to love, to mislead, to excite, maybe some unrealistic expectations! Whether it is a contract?

Boys they agreed that they would share his good fortune, love, life. Men, they shared this dream, rising from poverty to power. Creating an Empire based on greed, violence and betrayal, their dream will end a mystery that refuses to die...

- Think about what you are doing. The Treaty will establish peace between our kingdoms. There will be bright times, as in the days of our fathers.
But I'm not my father, and you are not Uther. If you have enough spirit to kill me?
- You leave me no choice.
- You don't get to choose, boy.