operation [Theme]

Any work must be paid. Otherwise, it is called exploitation.

Oh, of course, man has always and at all times idolized materialism and was inclined to see and understand freedom only in providing himself with money accumulated with all his might and stored by all means. But never have these aspirations been raised so frankly and so instructively to the highest principle as in our nineteenth century. “Everyone for himself and only for himself and all communication between people is unique for himself” - this is the moral principle of most of today's people, and not even bad people, but, on the contrary, working people who do not kill, do not steal. And ruthlessness towards the lower masses, and the fall of brotherhood, and the exploitation of the rich by the poor - oh, of course, all this was both before and always, but - but it was not raised to the level of the highest truth and science, but it was condemned by Christianity, and now, on the contrary , is elevated to virtue.

Cunning, intelligence, quality, speed, the coldness, hypocrisy, cynicism, meanness, treachery, weakness, conscience, choice, people, opportunism, survival, prosperity, wealth, exploitation, evil qualities, bad - these are the qualities, in that order, are creating a second person, do it - they cause excitement, it is the criterion on which they can learn, and they come looking for women.

America, which has set the standard of political behavior, ethics, employment is equal for all, open competition, etc., is now losing its normative. At some point in America, the slogan "no discrimination" has become so declarative that turned into a constant game. Why China, Russia has nowhere to hang these posters? Because here there is no discrimination. The idea is that by constantly reminding there is No discrimination, it leads to a social explosion. People accustomed to the fact that in fact there is discrimination. And need to go out and fight against it.
Dmitry Drobnicki
As the proletariat is convinced that there is exploitation.
Alexey Maslov
You are absolutely right. And there is not even a conspiracy theory. This system has gone viral. And it is very dangerous for the whole world. It is not only an internal affair of the United States.

First, we provided all basic medical care. Secondly, we have created different levels of care for those who are not satisfied with the base. We have ensured that everyone could receive the necessary medical care is not equal, but justified. We are not equal, we diet is different, so how can we demand equal treatment? Demagogues often claim that it is the exploitation of the poor to give to the poor of the best doctors and the best means. These talkers can get someone's vote, but the majority of people do not consider these actions to be reasonable and not believe them.

The manufacturers and masters say that our workers are ignorant and rude - because with them and have to turn rude. In the working class we do have a little education and a lot of brutality, - this cannot be denied. Just who is to blame most? To blame the manufacturers, craftsmen, officials who keep themselves with the workers, as bars with the serfs, do not want to recognize in the work an equal human being. Workers handle a polite request or question - and meet everywhere swearing, rudeness, threats.

Why to support the economy in the US and Europe have allocated so much money? The fact that the financial elite of the working man is a cash cow, which must constantly increase yields. But now "great uncle" realized that if the cow is not fed, then she just dies, and next year will be nobody to milk. A simple, cynical calculation and no humanity! It is capitalism, the system, which is ruled by oligarchs, a system in which who does not work shall eat.

Ordinary workers - it's just a cattle, just slaves to powerful people - that at us that abroad. Here and there they get crumbs from the master's table. The only difference is that countries such as USA, Germany, Britain - a country "first world" who drink the blood of the third world; therefore money is found there more, so social benefits there are more.

The result is an instantaneous drop in real incomes for a third of the enterprises had an inflow of free funds that they could not provide either the banks or the government. Thus, out of the crisis of 98-th year was carried out at the expense of ordinary workers. And since then, our country was finally approved by the Economics of cheap labour.

Anyone who earns adequately for a decent job, blood on their hands. If you get good money, then you someone to exploit. It is a fact. On one of the levels of the corporate structure who is suffering, large and in charge. Poor. Nature.

Regardless of geography, behind the Fig leaf of "historical reconciliation" lies a simple task - based on the pre-Soviet past, to keep the post-Soviet liberal economic order, the findings on the "bones" of the Soviet Union privatization. If it needs to Bandera - Bandera amiss, and if Vlasov - Vlasov amiss. Yes, even to Malyuta Skuratov. What's the difference? Nationalism is a defensive reaction of the elite caused it herself injustice. "We with you one blood. Be patient!" - like the plebeian patrician.

Why are some rich and others poor? Because some stole from others. They are rich because they stole. They are smart, talented, hardworking... thieves. This is not idealism. A materialistic answer. Because you can always vechicles: how, by whom, when and from whom stolen. The object of theft, and therefore a source of wealth is the unpaid labor and deceived consumers. Want to get rich - think at whose expense.

Competition forces you to introduce more advanced equipment and to reduce costs. But the problem is that man his wages, safety in the workplace is also costs. Savings in wages reduces the effective demand of the population. The increase in working hours or the intensity of labor is good only for competition, but bad for the employee; it takes away his health. In the pursuit of profit and cost reduction capitalists disregard the safety of not only their employees but also their customers and consumers.

- What offends you, Ross? What we Warleggan dared to get out of poverty and claim to gentility?
- Poverty does not offend me, exactly as a desire for more. But you're mistaken if you think greed and exploitation are the characteristics of a gentleman.