mass [Theme] Page 2

There is always a goat who will come up with some nasty thing about you. A sheep, which will not only let this information into the masses, but also definitely add something from itself, and a ram who will certainly believe all this.

On the other hand, he was pessimistic about the prospect of establishing a democratic society in the Soviet Union, a country that, in his words, "suffered absolutely fantastic damage in the human intellect." He has a very gloomy foresight of 35 years ago, which is acutely relevant to this day: "Can you imagine what will happen if we suddenly have democracy? Indeed, the masses... they will be given the opportunity to arbitrarily. After all, it will be the dominance of the most demagogic bastions ... They will finish off any reasonable methods of management, loot everything that is possible, and then sell Russia in parts.

Behind the descriptions of the Walking Dead, dotting the floor with intestines, I feel the shadow of professionals in the cleaning industry, because only they can rid the premises of corpse poison and deadly toxins. Perhaps, a huge part of the world's population, if God forbid the zombie Armageddon breaks out, will die not at all from the attack of bloodthirsty creatures, but from a banal bacterial infection, when hordes of rotting mass, filling cities and forests, in contact with any surface will leave millions and billions of invisible killers on it. Unless, of course, people canned themselves in anti-plague suits.

At the police academy, the first step is to instill situational awareness in future officers. The term, in essence, implies attention to what is happening in your neighborhood. The ability to assess the environment, the degree of danger and be ready, if necessary, to take appropriate measures before a crisis breaks out. However, the skill is necessary not only for public order agents, but also for an ordinary citizen: if you are absent-minded, you are vulnerable and completely unprepared for what may happen in a moment. Visual information helps to protect oneself from harm and saves lives, but observe what actually happens: the majority of pedestrians have their heads down, smartphones in their hands, what is going on a meter from their nose, they have no idea. You have no idea how many, because of such carelessness, were hit by cars, robbed, killed. It's not even about gadgets: some just hover in the clouds and do not control the space, that is, they give themselves up to chance. So is it any wonder that people fall out of the blue and break their spines, their bags are cut off, a racing skateboarder is knocked down, and the sole is decorated with dog shit? The typical human reaction time is about one and a half seconds. In a criminal excess, this is extremely high. And not a single criminal will give an opportunity for maneuvering, as, for example, in the event that an uncontrolled truck rushes at you. You either jump right away or you die.

Do you want to be special and stand out from the masses?
Tell the truth, or be kind.

It's easy to get bogged down trying to find the best plan for change: the fastest way to lose weight, the best program for building muscle, the perfect idea for a part-time job. We are so focused on finding the best approach that we don't take any action.

Happiness, ladies and gentlemen, is not an easy thing. It doesn't fall on you from the sky. It's a discipline. This is the ability to clean out the feces of their fears, turning on themselves. It's the ability to understand yourself.

Obviously, the "left" in Germany took their desire, their ideological-political attitude, for objective reality. This is the most dangerous mistake for revolutionaries. In Russia, where a purely wild and ferocious oppression of the tsarist particularly long and in particularly varied forms gave rise to revolutionaries of different persuasions, revolutionaries astonishing devotion, enthusiasm, heroism, will power, in Russia, this mistake of the revolutionaries we are especially closely watched especially carefully studied, especially because we know it is especially clearly visible on the other. For the Communists in Germany parliamentarism, of course, is "politically obsolete", but the point is not to accept obsolete for us obsolete for the class, for obsolete for the masses. Just here we again see that the "left" can't talk, can't behave as the party class, the party of the masses. You must not stoop to the level of the masses, to the level of the backward strata of the class. No doubt about it. You must tell them the bitter truth. You must call their bourgeois-democratic and parliamentary prejudices prejudice. However, you must soberly follow the actual state of consciousness and preparedness of the class (not only its Communist vanguard), of the entire toiling masses (not only of its advanced people).
If "millions" and "legions", but just a fairly significant minority of industrial workers is for Catholic priests, rural workers the landlords and kulaks (Grossbauern) - it is already here with certainty it follows that parliamentarism in Germany is not yet politically obsolete, that participation in parliamentary elections and in the struggle on the parliamentary rostrum is obligatory for the party of the revolutionary proletariat precisely for the purpose of educating the backward strata of its class, for the purposes of awakening and enlightenment to the poor, downtrodden, dark village mass. While you are unable to disperse the bourgeois Parliament and any reactionary institutions of a different type, you must work inside them precisely because there are more workers, duped by the priests and village corners, otherwise you risk becoming just windbags.

All of my stories and novels - local, and I wanted a little wider to embrace life, to murmur on my pages the winds of history and the masses that rolled over the layers of time and committed big long destiny.

I run away and I will work diligently, how much power is enough, but with one condition: that my work has brought real benefit to increase the amount of good necessary for the well-being of the masses.

What matters is what we did for his people. And the harder they [the Western press] will cluck over my moles and warts (they do me really a lot, but I never tried to get rid of them to embellish your appearance), the more they embarrass themselves. This happens because in our world, with great speed move not only large numbers of people, but information. And people increasingly rely not on what you can read in the newspaper or see on TV, and what either themselves witnessed, or trusted friends.
Until me interested investors - and they are much more important to me than the Western press, they will focus on what they are told the bankers and ambassadors, living in this country: is it worth it to industry to invest millions and even billions of dollars.

Not work inside the reactionary trade unions, that means leaving the insufficiently developed or backward masses of the workers under the influence of the reactionary leaders, the agents of the bourgeoisie, workers, aristocrats, or the "bourgeoisified workers".

In Russia we are experiencing (the third year after the overthrow of the bourgeoisie) the first steps of transition from capitalism to socialism or the lower stage of communism. Classes have remained and will remain everywhere for years after the conquest of power by the proletariat. Except maybe in England, where there are peasants (but there are small proprietors!), this time will be less. To destroy classes means not only to drive out the landlords and capitalists - that we relatively easy to do - it also means to destroy small producers, and they cannot drive, they cannot be suppressed, they have to get along, they can (and should) change, re only very prolonged, slow, cautious organizational work. They surround the proletariat on all sides the petty-bourgeois element, it is impregnated with it, corrupting it to him, cause constantly inside the proletariat relapses petty of being spineless, of fragmentation, of individualism, of the transitions from passion to depression. Need the strictest centralization and discipline within a political party of the proletariat to resist to the organizational role of the proletariat (which is his main role) to carry out correctly, successfully, victoriously. The dictatorship of the proletariat is a stubborn struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, pedagogical and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old society. The force of habit of millions and tens of millions is a most formidable force. Without a party of iron and tempered in struggle, without a party enjoying the confidence of all honest in the given class, without a party, able to follow the mood of the masses and to influence it, to conduct such a struggle successfully is impossible. To win large centralized bourgeoisie is a thousand times easier than to "vanquish" the millions and millions of small proprietors, and they are their everyday, routine, invisible, elusive, demoralizing activity is carried out by the same results which the bourgeoisie need, which restore the bourgeoisie. Anyone who weakens the iron discipline of the party of the proletariat (especially during its dictatorship), actually helps the bourgeoisie against the proletariat.

In our culture, the ingrained notion that deep intimacy is only possible in the context of a passionate romantic relationship with a Special Person, which we distinguish from the mass of other people. This view often limits us and cuts from other sources of intimacy, causing us to suffer when we can't find that Special someone.