minority [Theme]

On the other hand, Stalin was in no hurry to make revolutionary changes, if he wanted them at all. As in the case of Greece, he recognized that the Communists, who often played a leading role in the fight against fascism, were a minority in most of the liberated countries. Not sharing Trotsky's desire for a world revolution, Stalin once said that "communism fits Poland like a cow's saddle."

It is necessary that the strong do not enslave the weak, that the minority should not be a parasite or a pump for the majority, sucking the best juices out of it chronically, that is, it is necessary that everyone, without exception, both strong and weak, rich and poor, equally participate in the struggle for existence, every man for himself, and in this respect there is no better leveling means than physical labor as a common compulsory duty for all.

There is always hope, and there are always people - unfortunately a small minority - who defy dry statistics and manage to live a few more years.

He was against freedom of the press, against the participation of the masses in government, against democracy and the constitution, he was convinced that only a minority is reasonable.

No one can be perfectly free until everyone is free. No one can be completely moral until everyone is still moral. No one can be completely happy until everyone is still happy.

I'll tell you this: read Engels. Then listen to Soviet songs. And then you will know what is the cell of the state, and why the worldview is formed in the family, and then it will be much easier for you. Remember that your worldview was shaped not only by the Soviet school, but also by your family, as is the case with each of those present here.

What is a crime for the weak, then for the cold-blooded is a sign of strength. They are a small minority, but they are the ones who govern.

And if he is a devout Muslim, every person counts for you.

War differs from peace in that in the first case the executioners are forced people. The minority may be right, if only because the majority of Germans believed Hitler. You can't take someone else's, so at least destroy it.

Now about America, and what happens there. It is a logical development of "new" values. We see how the minorities discriminate against the majority. Here's what resulted from their values. They said that their values lead to qualitatively new vision of the world. To create a completely different person. And in fact, we see a simple mirror effect. These fine progressives did not invent anything the best how to really "put the horse on Roosevelt instead of Roosevelt sitting on a horse." Reverse discrimination. That's all worthy philosophical thought of the West? Something more interesting could come up with? This is the pinnacle of Western philosophy? In fact, it's a dead end. It is the failure of what is called Western philosophy, science, democracy in particular. It's still racism. That the West offers as a solution to their internal and external problems? As external challenges - geopolitical racism, the appointment of the wrong countries, the wrong history, which must always be subjected to pressure. And they came, and I think that's quite fair, to internal racism. Now this minority should discriminate against others. Sorry, when we begin to exalt the rights of minorities, as a single spotlight American perestroika, the only torch of freedom, that's got to be a logical result. This is what the West has sought and encouraged the others. What happens in America - it's hard to say. Why not demolish all the monuments of Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece? It's all been the slave of civilization. Look at the murals - and there are slaves, and the way some black. All this to carry, roll up the asphalt and put the cubes, blue squares, green triangles.

Obviously, the "left" in Germany took their desire, their ideological-political attitude, for objective reality. This is the most dangerous mistake for revolutionaries. In Russia, where a purely wild and ferocious oppression of the tsarist particularly long and in particularly varied forms gave rise to revolutionaries of different persuasions, revolutionaries astonishing devotion, enthusiasm, heroism, will power, in Russia, this mistake of the revolutionaries we are especially closely watched especially carefully studied, especially because we know it is especially clearly visible on the other. For the Communists in Germany parliamentarism, of course, is "politically obsolete", but the point is not to accept obsolete for us obsolete for the class, for obsolete for the masses. Just here we again see that the "left" can't talk, can't behave as the party class, the party of the masses. You must not stoop to the level of the masses, to the level of the backward strata of the class. No doubt about it. You must tell them the bitter truth. You must call their bourgeois-democratic and parliamentary prejudices prejudice. However, you must soberly follow the actual state of consciousness and preparedness of the class (not only its Communist vanguard), of the entire toiling masses (not only of its advanced people).
If "millions" and "legions", but just a fairly significant minority of industrial workers is for Catholic priests, rural workers the landlords and kulaks (Grossbauern) - it is already here with certainty it follows that parliamentarism in Germany is not yet politically obsolete, that participation in parliamentary elections and in the struggle on the parliamentary rostrum is obligatory for the party of the revolutionary proletariat precisely for the purpose of educating the backward strata of its class, for the purposes of awakening and enlightenment to the poor, downtrodden, dark village mass. While you are unable to disperse the bourgeois Parliament and any reactionary institutions of a different type, you must work inside them precisely because there are more workers, duped by the priests and village corners, otherwise you risk becoming just windbags.

Straights, straights, you are too small,
Those who take fat hands...

Terrorism is a word that more people represent a dissenting minority.

Not like everyone else, does not, as all.