TV show: Sunday evening with Vladimir Solovyov. Page 2

(continued)
But I'd like to say a little bit about the other. Look at what is happening in the world. What a suffocating and hopeless atmosphere was in the era of late globalization that the whole extravaganza, which we are seeing, not only in USA but also in England, in France, over in Germany, what happens in this cute gingerbread Germany, cabbage, sosochkami, and good beer. What is happening there? What was the stifling atmosphere of hopelessness, that what is happening there, is perceived as an alternative. And very serious people. And this, of course, very scary. Because those who want to go back to normal later globalisation will bring us in even more desperate alternative. This is what we are supposed to think.

I would like to say that I agree with V. A. Nikonov. The only. They have (in America) the key phrase is what is happening in Russia is a game. They can't because of their internal situation to be tough. They still perceive it as a game. They believe that they will be able to play back. And this is due to many actions. They are too confident in those factions in the elite that they form and control. As for the amendment by zero, not my quote, but really, you're going to the President, if you Putin the election will not win? Why run for President from any opposition, if you can't beat Putin? If you don't beat Putin in a fair election, then you are not a real President, a fiction. Putin will win the election and be a real President.

I must say that the parade, and, in General, the militarist education of the youth, and life in the context of: "if tomorrow war, if tomorrow a campaign" - this is normal, it is the norm that people who go to study the art of war is the new aristocracy of Russia. It is necessary to speak. But somehow we do all the time shy need to apologize. Your humble servant constantly asking the question: "do You kill people?" I'm on three military campaigns had been held there for three years. <...> I read recently Yevgeny Dolmatovsky poems are beautiful, he is a member of the Finnish campaign, the annexation of Western Belarus and Western Ukraine, participant of the great Patriotic war -- He said, "don't ask how many we killed, you'll have to ask - how much we saved!" <...> These people who are in Russia in the minority, this whole quasi-liberal, quasi-democratic public, they impose infinitely this some complex - all the time I in front of them now... "well, excuse me, we have a parade..." "so sorry - our children went to study military science...", "here they are marching at us...", "excuse me...". We have the rhetoric and practice do not always coincide. <...> We bring ourselves to the point that some banal things saying, we already feel like extremists!

Pushkin - that's what keeps modern Russia.

Now about America, and what happens there. It is a logical development of "new" values. We see how the minorities discriminate against the majority. Here's what resulted from their values. They said that their values lead to qualitatively new vision of the world. To create a completely different person. And in fact, we see a simple mirror effect. These fine progressives did not invent anything the best how to really "put the horse on Roosevelt instead of Roosevelt sitting on a horse." Reverse discrimination. That's all worthy philosophical thought of the West? Something more interesting could come up with? This is the pinnacle of Western philosophy? In fact, it's a dead end. It is the failure of what is called Western philosophy, science, democracy in particular. It's still racism. That the West offers as a solution to their internal and external problems? As external challenges - geopolitical racism, the appointment of the wrong countries, the wrong history, which must always be subjected to pressure. And they came, and I think that's quite fair, to internal racism. Now this minority should discriminate against others. Sorry, when we begin to exalt the rights of minorities, as a single spotlight American perestroika, the only torch of freedom, that's got to be a logical result. This is what the West has sought and encouraged the others. What happens in America - it's hard to say. Why not demolish all the monuments of Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece? It's all been the slave of civilization. Look at the murals - and there are slaves, and the way some black. All this to carry, roll up the asphalt and put the cubes, blue squares, green triangles.

That is the dilemma that States impose on the world the last few decades, is this: either you together with the United States and Europe and their super new values, or you rabid traditionalists like the ISIS or something like that. In fact, this idea is false. This is a manipulation. It is a falsification. A harmonious way out of this dilemma is the combination of the Foundation of traditional values and modernity. If you want, in the form of the national idea. Here it is necessary to practice. And we are pushing for this including external circumstances.

That you said that Russia is an island of common sense. Indeed it is. We talk a lot and are trying to formulate is not the first year something like national idea. I believe that this is correct, and we must move on. But around us the world is in a strange way the process by which we even do not unwittingly become a kind of ark sober sense. What is happening around us, the movement that as progress impose worldwide America and Europe, they are so perverted more or less understandable and natural concept of what is right and wrong, what is sensible and what is so wrong. That a large part of our population is not naturally accept. And the result is that of the great powers, to be honest, only Russia is a place which has a chance to find a reasonable and harmonious fusion between traditional values and modernity. This, I think, super goal.

I will say a few words about June 22, because it seems to me to ignore this day. One of the lessons from June 22, is that first, the powder should be kept dry always. Regardless of who and what thinks about it and says. We must be prepared for the worst options. Always. We must hope for the best but be prepared for the worst. This is the first. And second. One of the sad lessons of the Second world war, the great Patriotic war, that we should not overestimate the significance of any of any international agreements. And no international organizations.
- To not trust anyone. [remark of Vladimir Solovyov]
- Unfortunately, I can not trust anyone. We were quite active in the diplomacy, referring to the Soviet Union. Sometimes she was successful, sometimes less successful, sometimes not successful at all. The Soviet Union did try to negotiate in different directions, and build a security system. Not only for themselves but also for the whole of Europe. There were hopes for the League of Nations, there were hopes for agreement with the Western democracies, there were hopes that you can somehow restrain Nazi Germany. But the conclusion that's what. Happened the most terrible war in human history. For our country this war was incredibly destructive. As coronavirus is also, among other things. We must hope for themselves. It is necessary as much as possible, to ensure themselves that you can do for yourself. All this talk about international security configurations, about trust, about the systems of international law, international organizations... it's All good. Optional. Put it in the spotlight, make it the basis, the Foundation of policy, count on it, to think that in an emergency, we will cover the UN, or in the case which we met with so-and-so President, and he told me that would not expand NATO to the East - it's all nonsense.

It should be noted that the hero of the film "Russia. The Kremlin. Putin" Vladimir Putin wrote a very important article about the Second world war, which is not only a past but also a road map for the future. The greatest tragedy caused a fatal chain of events. But the main reason is state egoism, cowardice, pandering to the gaining strength of the aggressor, the unwillingness of political elites to compromise. We are not afraid to admit their mistakes, but not allow ourselves to be accused in the wrong. Because the mockery of the memory of meanness. We opened our archives and are waiting for the same steps from the allied countries. We are for honest conversation. And so Russia has proposed to hold the summit five. China (XI Jinping), France (macron), America (trump), Britain (Johnson) our initiative was supported. One it is important for leaders to show political will and work together to discuss the future, other countries, such as Poland, the Baltic States, only a pretext for political provocations. When I read an article (a great article) and I strongly recommend its reading... first, I do not recall that the head of such level wrote an article which analyzes the behavior and motives of the main players of world war II. It's one thing when it is written by historians, journalists... But when a person with this level of responsibility, analyses of what, why, and how it was made, it adds a special touch. Then I realize that hardly anyone can now available in the world politicians of this level, well maybe except for XI Jinping, to write an article that will fully reflect the feelings of the majority of the citizens of his country. Trump can't write such an article. Boris Johnson, the brilliant journalist, but I doubt he would want to write such an article. For him it is ancient history. We are very much curious, but for me it is also the answer to my eternal debate with N. V. Zlobin. Zlobin kept saying that in foreign policy there should be no morality. What Putin says, I don't remember to have said so in such terms about the modern acts of today's politicians. Here a direct allusion to America, and to Poland and to the Baltic States, and, of course, to Ukraine. Very, very tough.

Finally it is important to note that they are trying once again to solve your problem. It's not about us. In a country racked by protests. And the country asks for equality. Country asks for left ideas. The country no longer wants everything to be as it was, where every man for himself. Let's see what happens. If you don't have a paid med. insurance, sorry, you're screwed. If you have no job you have no honey. insurance you have got. You have nothing, you can't go to school. That's why you go on such crimes

We have proposed amendments in the Russian law over international on the territory of the Russian Federation. It is also very important. And this is also noted. Of course, they are trying to sabotage the Constitution by all possible means, vkidyvaya an incredible amount of money to work with the opposition. It is necessary to disrupt. Because Russia claims to have own position. And it immediately becomes a problem. And this must be addressed.

According to the article Nuland. A very interesting thing. Please note that the article was done around the amendments of the Constitution. Why? I think they knew what they were doing. This article in particular shows the contradictions that were uncovered by coronavirus. In fact, we saw a profound crisis of liberal ideas, where every man for himself. And here we see the amendments in the Constitution that say about the nationals. And compatriots is that? It's not just a citizen of Russia, every man for himself. Yes, he has rights. But compatriot as a group - this is Russian world. And it's scary.

- And the idea-then what? I did not understand that a hundred years have passed, And it became clear that the world denies Kipling with his white man's burden. All. This theme is no more. And suddenly we are horrified to realize that now is the only interesting to read this book the beginning of the century. Read "Sunset Of Europe". And horrified to realize that the author is right. Reread Marx.
Is already out of date
- No! It turns out that it is much more relevant than what you write today. Much more accurate and much deeper. Because we are talking about civilizational collapse. And that's the problem.
- This is not the first world order that is dying.
- Not order it. It is a profound mistake. What do you call the world order? You talk about alliances between States. And such a collapse has never happened before. Because everyone where we lived was, if anything, the white, colonialist Eurocentric world, who wrote their history, their version of religious beliefs. It's falling apart. This can be compared with the collapse of colonialism, but now it goes to a whole other level. And if we are not aware of and do not see what is happening around, we will not be able to see where it all goes. In my opinion.

- I don't think that's carnival. But the fact that it will affect the entire world order is obvious.
Will have an impact. And will affect the... yesterday We started to talk about it. Fundamental values are not. That was more or less clear at the beginning of the 18th century, early 19th century, it seemed that there is something in the beginning of the 20th century. And now it has become clear that there is nothing. The last 50 years, the idea is not developed. There is no development around which to build a state. So now all falls to the level of national States. But if a nation state, that national history, tradition, understanding. And it became clear that all this erosion, these trinkets do not work. So on one hand we have the Trotskyists, who settled in universities, including our own, where only care about the destruction and individual rights. But the rights of the individual young people only exist through the oppression of the rights of others, which they do not consider personalities. Because they can't product to produce. They can Rob or take away. And create new and do not know how. .... Take and share - that's all they can say.