TV show: Sunday evening with Vladimir Solovyov. Page 4

There is a good movie that features the beautiful quote "America is not a country, it's business". In principle, statehood, unity is not there. Because if you dig deeper, the ideology of liberalism is built on the fact that man is his world, his lawn. All the rest did not care. The American dream is built on this. So everyone builds his own world. So when it comes to what to throw, as they say, someone under the bus in this situation, Yes, went to the protests. But these protests are incredibly profitable, unfortunately. Then you will need to restore these buildings, you will need to pump new money...

It is perfectly valid not to like Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin. You can not tolerate Isaac Newton and albert Einstein. But you cannot undo the theory of relativity and the law of gravity. This question is not about how good or bad. It's a question of what these people have discovered some laws, not the world, as we were taught in school, but they really work. The world today is experiencing a crisis of the liberal economic model. And about everyone is saying. And where is the world? He is moving apparently in the direction of socialism, which is predicted by Karl Marx. Everybody thought that it happened in 1917. Karl Marx did not say that it would be in 1917. He said that this model needs to be transformed into the following. But the question that no one can find the exact economic model of socialism that works. Remember the Soviet model, which worked only partly. And the question is that China just found her. And so China came out on top. I understand that the Russian establishment is intolerant, because the Russian establishment is all westernized. He can't bear the thought that some China will be the leader. But you have to accept. Just as we must accept what Karl Marx really have competent ideas. There's nothing you can do about it. As for what is happening in the United States. I'm pretty sure British intelligence in 1917 a lot was done to destroy the Russian Empire. But I understand that if in the Russian Empire there would be underlying problems, there is no British intelligence have not been able to do. As I understand that the CIA, and NB worked in the 1989-1991 year in the Soviet Union. I lived in the Soviet Union. It was really a lot of problems. And that was the reason. The same thing is happening in America. It's still a certain contradiction in the country. And there's nothing you can do about it.

I showed how the Chinese are anti-American propaganda. They do very well. They showed on TV the performance of trump on the White house lawn, with Chinese subtitles. No comment. Where trump says: you know, China regularly destroys the American economy, and that we are now dependent on China's economy. And below are Chinese comments of outraged Chinese citizens the type of guys you're being forced to accept our investment? What is the problem? And no more comments.
This is one of the paradoxes of the Chinese, again, I agree with Karen Georgievich. The Chinese system survived. And she survived because she was not cut from different systems. This is a purely Chinese, hard. Here, the mixing system is not necessary.

They waited for the start of the unrest that will lead to the fall of China. While China focuses on the preservation of jobs, not just helicopter money, no. On the preservation of jobs. Social guarantees to the people. Here we see: America is not prepared for the arrival of coronavirus, the most popular video is like the President trump explains that this is nonsense, and not worth paying attention to. Give the possibility of American companies to fire anyone they want, do not care: Ah, checks send. Forty million unemployed. And what do we get? We receive extremely unpleasant, but very local event, tragic but very local event, in a fairly prosperous state, we get frantic excitement, because forty million unemployed - this is such an explosive environment that no helicopter money it will not stop. So what we see in the USA is one of the consequences of coronavirus. So here, too, we need to understand what we are facing, and where it will lead.

Only the state has the right to legitimate violence. In order to ensure the rights of their citizens. There must be a balance, which is called the right. It is based on the Constitution and other laws. By the way, trump can use the law in 1937 when the uprisings may introduce Federal troops. Why I talked about the case 1967-68. Because there, in addition to the national guard, which by the laws of the state can be used by order of the Governor of the state. There is also the right of the Federal government to intervene by Federal troops. Ie can enter the Federal portion. Not only of the police. Can enter any part. In 1967 he was armored vehicles of the marine corps. So now it may not come to an end.
On the other hand it is obvious that ... so I looked up a few frames. An interesting situation is obtained. Go protesters with flowers, Recalling the 60-ies, when the muzzle of the rifles inserted flowers, to be Miro, we are peaceful demonstrators. But behind them the guys with the bats, tied with some masks, but obviously to hide his face. Carry a small bottle of milk to wash the eyes from pepper gas. This suggests that it is necessary for someone. But if it is necessary for someone, then it is a political phenomenon.

I recall the words of the great Russian philosopher Berdyaev, who once said: revolution is a natural disaster. As the earthquake. It is absolutely useless to evaluate it from the point of view of good or bad. It can't be stopped.
I recall that a hundred years ago, when we started the February revolution in Russia, it started with the fact that not brought up the bread in two. And before that there was no bread and so much happened. Somehow, in that moment, all this led to the fact that Rozanov said: the Russian Empire faded in three days. And what is happening now in America, the beginning of this new American revolution or not, we'll see. But this is life, we can expect anything. And possible the most unpredictable turns. But this all has some sort of internal logic. I once, when trump was elected just yet, I'm on this program with Zhirinovsky argued for a case of champagne. I said that America has come to the shootings. Well, I'm close to win. Maybe not quite, but it is obvious that what we are often told, and I have always been, what America needs is included in the point that the Soviet Union was restructuring. Now it's obvious. Look, in America is an epidemic, these events, and the American Communist party - that the Republicans and Democrats are one and the same. As well as in the Soviet Union, the country has fallen apart and the Communist party at this time in the face of their most prominent leaders shared power. Is Mikhail Gorbachev, with Boris Nikolayevich. The same is now happening in the United States.
But if the Americans still often turned to the founders of Marxism-Leninism, they would remember the remarkable words of Lenin, that there are moments when tops cannot, and bottoms do not want. They would be remembered a genius, in my opinion, the wording of Marx, despite all that, he's much out of date, but it is not obsolete, on the relationship of production relations and productive forces. I.e. that the level of technology dictates the social and political system. It seems to me that the General crisis is deep, but it is an external expression. What the world faces, we see in this epidemic. The fact that liberalism is unable to cope with these very complex processes, which have arisen in the modern world. It turns out that this is best cope China, well, he conquered the epidemic, what is it? China has managed to combine the Soviet experience with the market. And saved the party. To defeat the epidemic are unable and Western countries, and partly because we. And we partly liberal and partly Soviet. Where we are liberal, we have a lot of infections, and where the Soviet, we have little mortality.

But you know, Einstein never reached the level of elementary particles, although well versed in them. In the sense that he was never an elementary particle, and there lived. In the sense that knowledge of America, of course, important, but sometimes there is a aberration near vision. When he is inside stuck, sometimes can't see. Large seen from a distance. Knowledge of America does not imply that you necessarily live there.

And in my opinion, no matter how developed relationships in China, China has a much greater chance of leadership in this world. Because, I repeat, China before anyone managed to find the system that, in my opinion, adequate to the challenges that are present today. Ie is a powerful public management, it solves the problem. Can we repeat it? Unlikely. Because the Chinese kept the party. It is their basis.

Now liberalism has become General in something... you know, like moonshine, eternally persecuted creature is moonshine and liberalism.

- I will not argue. I will complete my main idea, in my opinion, conclusion. Its meaning is the following. USA in its policy of force and us...
- Of course!
... and China to take a boxer's stance. We may not have wanted this.
And it's a mistake. This is the basic error of this martial arts. If you offer with the boxer to box, had it not come. You will always lose to box with a boxer.

- It's all very simple - what my colleagues have said. Now they (the West) will attempt to gather under one
the absolute power of the British Commonwealth, plus Mexico, etc. This will be the macro-region, hosted autarkical way.
If they started doing this 3-5 years ago, I would say that it is a normal scenario that can be implemented.
Now - is incredibly difficult. Because coronaries is the most powerful catalyst of all processes.
And this is its main function. He on the one hand has accelerated everything, but on the other hand, he destroyed the mechanisms of control
that seemed unshakable. Including the mechanism of the dollar. Too much became clear.
So the plans, it appeared, but whether they implement this I have a big question.
- No time - so time later. And who before them will create macro-regions?
I don't understand what it means to catch or not catch. I believe quite differently. Vysotsky: We managed to visit God,
there is no delay. Ie basically if you went to God, you will not have to rush.
But to emerge will who will survive and who will not have time. Because this is a race for survival, for a chance at life.
And it's not a competition. I throw garbage in the trash all the talk about competition systems, method
cohabitation and O. Race from death. In a broad sense, civilization.
Yes, You are right, Europe has gone the distance. It is time to call someone to bury.
But there is a Chinese civilization, ours, and Anglo-Saxon. And it's a deadly race of historical significance,
that is now beginning. And no question, who has time before to form this region. I will formulate differently.
He will form a macro-regional autarky, who will survive. The dead can't form.

When we now argue, the world after the coronavirus, the main answer is that the trend, on the one hand, to strengthen the struggle without rules, and on the other hand, the trend in the strengthening of peace without truth, will continue to increase. Unfortunately, we see it.
By the way, the Chinese comrades is well noticed, they called US policy in the world today is a political virus. They were cultural in the Chinese tradition, because it meant that the United States is the political virus. Penetrates healthy cells, destroying them, and of these bricks is building its own economy.

I can provide a definition that will help You. The cold war is different from any other form of competition, the fact that the result of the cold war is the attempt to change the ruling system. So if You do not aim to overthrow the ruling class and changing the system of governance and changes in the internal structure of the country,
You may have competition. When America is directly declares that China is the enemy because he scary the Communist party, and the people of China must be freed from pressure when directly declared that Russia is ruled by a terrible dictatorship and tyranny, and the people of Russia should be free, as they say, here all is clear.

I think we talk a little about that. We go somewhere in politics, in the economy, in liberal values. The topic was not disclosed. Because really the question of what will happen after the coronavirus - this question is absolutely moral. Maybe I will tell sedition, because there are people here more educated, but the economy will recover once the epidemic will go on recession. For the religious person is the plan of the Creator. Question: do we in this life? How we meet this goal? Coronavirus is part of the plan of the Creator. Important conclusions that we do. Paradoxically, we now celebrate the mourning of ARTNeT, which happened about two thousand years ago, in the second century. This disease in the Talmud is called diphtheria. It affects the upper respiratory tract. As a result the person dies from suffocation. Yes, there are very specific physical causes. But in parallel with this, there are spiritual causes. The reasons that people do not respect each other. So thought the sages who lived at the time.
We talked about the change or not. Anthropomorphic people haven't changed in a very long time. When we talk about change, when a person repents - this is the change. Can he hold the same political beliefs. But the feeling of remorse... In the Hebrew language is the word "Emunah". Almost like immunity. It - faith. Repentance is not necessarily in sin. It is a realization that we went somewhere not there. It is a change. Apparently it does not manifest itself. If you repent, hospitals, of course, not empty. God gave doctors the right to treat. The doctor treats a medicine, and God helps or does not help. There's an extra spiritual effort. The question is, how do we comply with spiritual values. When we talk about values we attribute to this word a different meaning.