model [Theme] Page 1

Happiness is what is with you here and now. And this is not a bank account, not an iPhone of the latest model, and not the number of subscribers on Instagram. Happiness is that your loved ones are alive and well. The fact that you have friends, those who are always glad to you, who accept you as you are, and are ready to come to your aid at any moment. You are happy when you have someone to take care of, and there is someone who needs this care.

Are you walking down the street? Check for pursuit, train your attention, train a silent gait, imagine behavior patterns if you are attacked by a part of those around you, a brick falls from above, a car flies onto the sidewalk ... and don't forget about muscles, and everything else.

People are also becoming obsolete, like car models; Major Brutt was a model of 1914-1918: there is no more demand for people like him. And at the same time, he continues to live so persistently on that it is even a pity that he cannot be handed over for spare parts...

I just want to understand: Who in America foresaw 2020? Who foresaw all that had happened? Who developed models for getting out of this situation? Who is at least one more or less competent analytical material about the consequences of economic, social, psychological and others? I've read a lot of people, and neither Stratford is even close to anything like it. Not RAND, not a bunch of others that are in this market. I didn't even see a real attempt at comprehension.

The concept of democracy has got lost in three pines. You, N. V. Zlobin, say that the majority is not always right. Well, everyone, we came! This means that the majority is right only when it makes the right decisions. Hence logically: who evaluates the correctness of the decision? That's what today's global democracy is all about. Today, the criteria for assessing democracy has been reduced not to what the majority votes for, but to what the strongest countries, specifically America, legitimize.
In principle, we can agree that democracy has many advantages. But in practice, this has degenerated into only one thing: everything is determined by the strongest. America and its allies are demonstrating this to the world.
Those who today consider themselves democrats are incapable of seeing the internal flaws of democracy itself. We need a real, objective in-depth and professional analysis. This analysis is unable for Democrats around the world, including Fukuyama with his end of history. And they don't want to. Because they believe in democracy as sectarians.
You asked, what system could be better than democracy? Yes, any. You just need to know on what issue. For example, on some issues, the monarchy copes better than democracy.
Today's democrats very much resemble the stupid party functionaries of the Soviet Union.
What we can agree on is that the world is on the verge of new models. Because everyone is tired of democracy. In this mode, the world will no longer live. Let Fukuyama write at least 500 articles. What models they will be is another question. But the fact that this is an urgent and urgent need is absolutely certain.

... we are stylistically still in the Soviet past or in the perestroika period and we are measuring everything: Soviet or anti-Soviet. Listen, the world has moved on. Everything! Things got more complicated. And it makes no sense to return. And it makes no sense to absolutize what we read in books on capitalism in the late 80s and 90s. This is quite obvious. The tasks facing such a huge country as Russia require some kind of complex, but new in quality model, taking into account all the achievements of the past and adapted to the challenges of the present and the future. And how it will be called, I understand that this is important in the discussion, but it can be called in different ways. As for me, the name Orthodox socialism would suit me. Why? I explain. Orthodox not from the point of view of imposing a confession, but from the point of view of the realization that our moral and ethical foundations are still based on the roots of the Orthodox faith and Orthodox culture. And socialism - not from the point of view of a return to Soviet practice, but from the point of view of the feeling that a really huge number of people do not feel justice. People want the truth.

Our main thesis is that the psychological professional community has an extremely significant mission in the new century. This mission is to promote the innovative development model as a whole and its individual components in a variety of industries and areas of activity. In our opinion, the place of Russia in the world, and the competitiveness of individual economic and socio-cultural projects and, (importantly!) The adaptive capabilities of an individual, depend on how such progress will take place. Thus, the acceptance of this mission will allow psychology to realize its value system and its humanitarian and technological potential.

I'll tell you what ... sorry. It’s impossible, I’ll be a creep, it’s impossible to pull imported economic models onto our, damn it, Russian reality. I’ll tell you this: dear, in fact, a hell of a lot and more! I checked it myself and even chose one of them ... well, it doesn't matter. The way is still one, one way. He was also taught in this, well, like her ... at school x2. He was also written in this, like him ... well, a French biologist, well, a bearded ... Karl Marx! In-in. This path is the creation of a surplus product! The product must be added, not diminished. Sorry, but there is no way to add it ... to hell, only interest in adding it, with such power, no one has. I said everything!

Individuals with success intelligence actively seek out for themselves a model worthy of emulation. Throughout life they may have several such models and their own success is a conglomeration of the best features derived from different models. In other words, they don't just blindly follow any of his models, but rather form their own personality, different from others. In addition, they observe the behavior of people who fail, noting for myself the factors that led to the loss, and then take all measures to ensure to not to repeat such mistakes.

You need a mental model. And the whole varied experience of his life you will have to mounted on the bars of these mental models. You will find that some just learn it all by heart. Well, these people fail in their studies and achieve nothing in life.

After all, to break habitual patterns of behavior, it is often necessary to break a soul.

When I walk down the runway, I can at a glance to start or to stop the war. I make people want what I have. Because on the runway I take out his soul and all her show.

It is perfectly valid not to like Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin. You can not tolerate Isaac Newton and albert Einstein. But you cannot undo the theory of relativity and the law of gravity. This question is not about how good or bad. It's a question of what these people have discovered some laws, not the world, as we were taught in school, but they really work. The world today is experiencing a crisis of the liberal economic model. And about everyone is saying. And where is the world? He is moving apparently in the direction of socialism, which is predicted by Karl Marx. Everybody thought that it happened in 1917. Karl Marx did not say that it would be in 1917. He said that this model needs to be transformed into the following. But the question that no one can find the exact economic model of socialism that works. Remember the Soviet model, which worked only partly. And the question is that China just found her. And so China came out on top. I understand that the Russian establishment is intolerant, because the Russian establishment is all westernized. He can't bear the thought that some China will be the leader. But you have to accept. Just as we must accept what Karl Marx really have competent ideas. There's nothing you can do about it. As for what is happening in the United States. I'm pretty sure British intelligence in 1917 a lot was done to destroy the Russian Empire. But I understand that if in the Russian Empire there would be underlying problems, there is no British intelligence have not been able to do. As I understand that the CIA, and NB worked in the 1989-1991 year in the Soviet Union. I lived in the Soviet Union. It was really a lot of problems. And that was the reason. The same thing is happening in America. It's still a certain contradiction in the country. And there's nothing you can do about it.

What is the value of a diamond if there is no one to show what is the value of latest models of cars, if there is nobody around who has expressed his admiration or envy for the achievements of you?