technology [Theme] Page 3

What matters is what we did for his people. And the harder they [the Western press] will cluck over my moles and warts (they do me really a lot, but I never tried to get rid of them to embellish your appearance), the more they embarrass themselves. This happens because in our world, with great speed move not only large numbers of people, but information. And people increasingly rely not on what you can read in the newspaper or see on TV, and what either themselves witnessed, or trusted friends.
Until me interested investors - and they are much more important to me than the Western press, they will focus on what they are told the bankers and ambassadors, living in this country: is it worth it to industry to invest millions and even billions of dollars.

The government understands the concerns of citizens due to the influx of immigrants and foreign workers. We have taken steps to regulate the flow and increase the difference between citizens and non-citizens. However, citizens should understand that with decrease of population Singapore needs more educated immigrants, especially those who have qualified in the USA or Europe. Most of the immigrants of the last wave and our citizens are specialists in Finance, IT and research. They bring new technology, strengthen global reach and are actively seeking to improve life for their families. They make us more dynamic and competitive.

We should support small and medium businesses to strengthen ties with multinational corporations in such countries as Japan and Germany. We must become their partners so they could get modern technology and streamlined production, and our businesses are small and medium businesses would grow at the expense of their own resources. They will be able to grow to large corporations only if their leadership will show acumen and entrepreneurial spirit. Government support could help them, but it will not be the decisive factor by which the small business will become big or successful.

I have rejected the model of industrialization through import substitution. While most third world countries was suspicious of the idea of working for Western multinational corporations, Singapore opened the doors for them. They helped us grow, brought new technology and modern know-how, and raised productivity as fast as could not have raised any other action.

No one better than the Japanese can't improve technology.

First we create the tools, then the tools create us.

We should be aware of the threat associated with high living standards and unemployment benefits, and very strictly to ensure that the officially registered unemployed people in good faith looking for a job. Whenever in the big cities of industrialized countries, I find a curious paradox: high unemployment and lack of waiters, taxi drivers, nurses and cleaners. Some types of work are paid so that no draw, and in addition, there are good unemployment benefits. Whatever principles may be guided in this matter developed industrial countries, the poor in Singapore resources is labour intensive for high reward remains the best way to attract capital and technology as the basis for future wealth.

We may admire and master their science, to study the technology, art management and know-how in the art of marketing but we will never adapt to Western social customs and lifestyle. We must learn from the experience of Japan - as in less than 100 years (since the Meiji Restoration[26], which began in 1868), they turned into a modern industrial power, carefully preserving their culture and traditions.

... But what to do in the future society, where private capital and small businesses are missing completely? We have a proactive, caring person creates revolutionary technology, then releases a propaganda video clip, which introduces the audience to a specific platform, and he is competing with other videos - is a public vote. Projects that have passed public scrutiny, then are subject to scientific control. Therefore, the project receives the initial reaction of the consumer, and we understand that for people it's interesting; research Department checks the project at ispolnilos. Then given the "green light" and the project comes into production, first in limited quantities. Then going to a secondary reaction of the consumers - the people (again) to vote. Based on these data is governed by the further issue.

The socialist system of the Soviet Union could produce revolutionary technology, when she staged the corresponding task, for example, space satellite, space flight. The problem was that the bureaucracy knew very well what she wants in the defense and in space, but she had no idea what to improve in the economy until it appeared on the same West.
Thus, if socialism be really democratic, if the population can shift the bureaucracy, if you will work effectively the state program to support innovative solutions, then private ownership can be painless to get rid of.

I must admit I love the technical innovations: click here pouring.

In the last days many discussions on social networks about the fact that in conditions of "isolation" the education system was 90% ready to transition to the on-line platforms and digital technologies of the educational process. That, supposedly, in the new situation has sharply reduced the quality and effectiveness of learning compared to traditional forms of organization of educational process and contact teaching. I want to caution You against this common misconception. The changes just showed the real state of the system of education, training, education - it and contact formats were not taught anything and in 90% of cases simply wasting precious time of students. And 10% percent of the students with the necessary reflective skills and skills of self-organization, studied in the framework of the old system and will continue to do so during the transition to on-line. They are due to different circumstances mastered activity "exercise" and will continue to learn despite all the efforts of teachers, parents and organizers of the processes of training and education.

Capitalism drives progress only where it is beneficial, where can be made cheaper. And moving progress where you can increase sales and "first deceive" people. Plus - to engage in speculation. The result is better developed information technology, information transfer, telecommunications. Worse develop machine automation. No reduction of working hours, although the progress is already allows.

Instead of research being repeated by unthinking application of imported theories, involving, in strict accordance with a progressive stereotypes that Russia is the same country as those in which techniques are created.