management [Theme] Page 3

Who can adequately lead people until he learns to follow God himself?

You cannot judge your ability to manage anything without examining the limits of your possibilities.

- That's right, you always understand: everyone can talk, and as a country to conduct, so Pushkin ...
- Yes, I can't, but I can vote! And to feed our economy with medicines will be those who learned for it!

The art of managing is “no”, “yes”, “no” ... And again “yes” until the next “no”.

And I say: in order to lead our people, we need to take a little bit in the morning. Not for fun. Just to understand their workers.

- Command, Captain.
- Okay, listen. Until we close the portal, we need to restrain them. Barton, go up to the roof. Look at both. Look for groups and singles. Stark, keep the perimeter. If someone moves farther than three blocks, chase back or incineration.
- Will you toss me?
- Sure. Hold on tight, Legolas.
- Thor, press them at the exit of the portal. Slow them down. You have lightning. Roast the bastards. You and I (Natasha) stay on the ground. Let's fight here. And the Hulk... Sre them.

but until we give her life.

Most of the specialists (both representatives of management theory and historians) attribute the fact of the origin of organizational and managerial thought activity to the last quarter of the nineteenth century. It was during this period that two lines of thought development were united: the line associated with the social sciences (the theory of state and law, sociology and social psychology, history), and the line associated with the expansion of practical intelligence (in the field of politics, administrative law, the formation of large-scale industry).
In the process of this synthesis, it was possible to combine two types of reflection: research (object-ontological) and project (organizational), which existed before and the results of which were broadcast independently of each other. In this context, for the first time it became possible to raise questions about which objects can be applied to known methods of organization, and vice versa, what methods of organization and design create (produce) specific social objects and phenomena?

Here he was in the hated role of the administrator. People bored Manchek; the mechanics of managing subordinates and quirks of their characters held no fascination for him. Often he wanted to return to their aerodynamic pipes to the Institute. Especially on those nights when he was called out of bed to quickly solve any stupid question.

The man who lives controlled by their emotions, it is like living with woman.

- It's not big, but fast. The whole year I trained to manage such a vessel.
- And now we learn how to die.

The term chaotic has appeared in spin-doctoring for quite some time. Were used against the East. As the Middle and Middle. Chaotic, pursued by the Americans due to the overthrow of the regimes, this is all well known and well seen. This technology is not something, and belongs to the category of special operations, the de facto military government, which aims the destruction of a sovereign state. The main goal is the inability of the government to carry out their sovereign policy. The use of these technologies in different countries just were chaotic, the destruction of the state, and as a result of the country where it was started, continued to be independent players, and the population of these countries were not destined to a better fate.

It is the correct word several times said technology. When in twentieth century science fiction writers, futurists talked about the technology, they usually talked about some ridiculous electronics, visitors from the future arrived, something else. It seemed that the XXI century was largely a century of humanitarian technologies, management technologies. Everything that was developed over well, at least the second half of XX - beginning of XXI century, and American political institutions, and centers, the same sharp, same well-known experts, this all worked badly in the twentieth century. But as soon as it is felt in the modern information reality, it all soared the most, was working very well. And today, under the "color revolution", but actually a technology of destruction of the state regime, its demolition de facto, coup d'état, under this technology, we understand very specific things. By the way, thank God in Russia in the scientific community for several years studied this topic in the expert community, and we are engaged... Collected quite a serious amount of information. Today we understand that this is clearly a proven technology. Of course growing. Within it there is a huge amount of aspects. One of the aspects of what You said - it is necessary to detach the power unit in any state from (relatively) of people and authorities. Tear in different ways: to discredit, by swinging the situation inside the power unit, the rocking of the psychological state of employees of power structures. today it is a very serious technology. On the one hand this mass censure (what we see with the US), and on the other hand is a technology of intimidation. The one thing that made the request of Nancy Pelosi - give complete lists of employees, we can see them, who will get to work on the streets. This technique of intimidation by law-enforcement officers.
This technology of course is developing. Not to say that what worked 10 years ago will also work today. Or what worked in America will work in Russia. But attempts of this technology of course will continue at various levels. Most importantly, what do these technology - they study society on the number of it layers and contradictions. And these contradictions are beginning quietly to embroider, stick pins in them. It can be racial, ethnic, socio-economic contradictions. In any society, they are. But the technology podrazumevaet creating and faux wrap and the management of this protest potential primarily through randomization.