capitalism [Theme] Page 1

- And capitalism does not take root here. [remark by Vladimir Solovyov]
- I understood this important moment when I became the director of Mosfilm. The fact is that Russia is a very expensive country in terms of utilities. It does not stand up to competition in terms of utilities, and in terms of distances. Now in Los Angeles +25 degrees. There is no need for a roof, no need to clean icicles, no heating - none of this is needed. Even from this point of view, everything we do always has an element that we cannot cope without the participation of the state. And what is state involvement? This is socialism. This is what society should help its producers. But our society has hardly done anything since the '90s. Now they started doing it. Here is a simple example - V. V. Putin, I believe, adopted a brilliant decree from January 1 to prohibit the export of unprocessed wood. This means that investments will go here, jobs will appear. But it took thirty years. And why couldn't it be done in '92? It's such an obvious thing that... They exported round timber to China, left, right...

Here is the temple of capitalism, registration of a company is a matter of a matter of days. But it would take a financial investment from you to prove your selfless belief in success. Half a million bucks - and it's in the bag.

False information makes more money for companies than the truth. The truth is boring.

If you do not pay for the goods, then you are a commodity.

Marx was wrong not because he was wrong in theory, but precisely because he was right.
What is this mistake and why did he come to what is now widely recognized as false? Not at all because the West did not reach the point of revolution, although the capitalism described by Marx has survived. Marx was wrong, and not because the capitalism he described did not exist at all (as was often and eagerly repeated in the 19th century). Marx was mistaken precisely because, firstly, capitalism in his time was exactly as he described it, and, secondly, because this capitalism itself was able to resolve the economic shortcomings or "contradictions" discovered by Marx and described by him. Moreover, he did it in the direction indicated by Marx himself, not only in a "revolutionary" or "dictatorial", but in a peaceful and democratic way.

Some religions - such as Christianity and Nazism destroyed millions of "righteous" hatred. Capitalism killed millions of indifference.

In order to defeat capitalism, we need to combine 3 ideologies: Trotskyism, Stalinism and Marxism-Leninism. After all, these ideologies are what will kill the bourgeois democracy, liberalism.

Here is Vladimir, and here is the antithesis - another Vladimir, who in October 1917, the year became the head of an absolutely devastated country, where there is a "molecular" civil war, banditry, terrorism, in which the economy is nothing, in which most of the territory given to the enemy, he creates the state. Lenin is the man who out of chaos created the state, which was hard enough, but it was hard just the same as the father's violence against children. Therefore, the more Putin will be in power, the more real the image of the other Vladimir. They contradict each other, they like philosophy dichotomous pair: Lenin is the man who out of chaos creates reality, Putin is the man who reality turns into chaos, the chaos of capitalism, the chaos of infinite crisis. So, naturally, even unconsciously, without even reading Lenin, not even realizing Lenin, instinct people will seek to Lenin.

It works of art primarily form the perception of historical events and influence the minds of the masses. Look, look, the role of Zuleiha Chulpan Khamatova is still talking about the necessity of the study of history on who do you think - Solzhenitsyn. And if the struggle with the revolutionary legacy of the Soviet regime on the sly is moving in our culture and propaganda, and the bourgeois creative elite hates the Soviet past, almost manic level, such creations will still occur.

American Russophobia is not Russophobia, it's an American delusion of grandeur. They call themselves "masters ov the universe", that is "masters of the universe, of the world." I have met perfectly normal people, Americans, who seriously said: "We are Romans".

The Soviet Union - a country that poses a threat to the Western world. I'm not talking about a military threat. It actually was not... I mean the economic threat. Due to the planned policy and a peculiar combination of moral and material incentives, the Soviet Union managed to achieve high economic performance... the Soviet Union was a real opportunity to drive us from the world markets. Therefore, we have always taken action aimed at weakening the economy of the Soviet Union and the establishment of his domestic difficulties.

Thatcher in the 91st year, he acknowledged that the Soviet Union in the 80s represented for the West an economic threat. It was a problem for the West - to be or not to be for the ruling groups of the West, as well as, say, the situation in America in the second half of the 30s - to-be, you need to start the Second world war.

For a guy spying on the Communists, he is too good capitalist.

Capitalism inevitably leaves socialism the legacy, on the one hand, the old, centuries-old, professional and craft distinctions among the workers, on the other hand, trade unions which only very slowly, for years and years, can develop and will develop in a broader, less shops, industrial unions (covering the whole production and not just the workshops, craft or profession), and then, through these industrial unions, to move on to the destruction of the division of labor between people, to education, to the education and training of comprehensively developed and comprehensively trained people, people, who know how to do everything. This communism is, needs to go and come, but only through a long number of years. Today, almost trying to anticipate the next result is quite developed, it is strengthened and established, it is expanded and Mature communism, is still that four year old child to teach higher mathematics.