TV show: Evening with Vladimir Solovyov. Page 2

Climate Summit kicked off in Glasgow today. And why is this topic being promoted? This summit is holding some kind of intermediate result. For if earlier America divided countries into democracy and non-democracy, now it will divide into those who fit and those who do not fit the climate agenda. Global warming is becoming a new weapon. It is not difficult to guess how it will end. The natural resources of the states will be declared a world heritage. Not national. And if a sovereign state disposes of its natural resources incorrectly from the point of view of the United States, then foreign intervention is possible. That is, sovereignty will be put on cancellation with the help of a new climate policy. A very beautiful scheme. If a country behaves unreasonably and threatens the existence of all mankind, then the progressive part of mankind has no other way out. So, then we must sacrifice this country, this people. The situation is very beautiful. I remember everything that seemed to us nonsense. This phrase was attributed to Albright. That Russia has no right to all of its natural resources. Everyone thought it was fake. And now we have lived to the point where fakes become true. But only from the lips of other people. How great it turns out. Russia is to blame. And when Putin says: wait a minute. We, firstly, absorb for the whole world. We have forests. What they say: do not be fooled. Your job is to cut. And what - will the troops be brought in?

... and then the moment comes when you have to say yes or no. And as the military all know: it is better to make a wrong decision than not to make a decision in time.

- Yes, we proceed from this, because we have never begun to deteriorate our relations either with NATO, or with the European Union, or with any other country in the West or any other region of the world. Everyone knows this story well. And when Saakashvili gave the criminal order to bomb Tskhenval and the positions of the Russian peacekeepers in August 2008, Russia insisted on convening a NATO Council of Russia to consider the situation. The then Secretary of State, Candolisa Rice, flatly refused. Although, when creating the Council of Russia, NATO was especially emphasized in the fundamental act that it must act in any weather. And especially should gather in crisis situations. This example marked the beginning of the current state of affairs in relations between Russia and NATO. This continued when the Americans provoked and supported the coup in Ukraine in February 2014, and the European Union swallowed the actions of the opposition, although on the eve of this coup, Germany, France, Poland, with their signatures, guaranteed an agreement between the then President Yanukovych and the opposition. And in the morning the opposition trampled on all these guarantees of the European Union and did it in its own way. And for this, the European Union imposed sanctions against Russia. You see, there is no need to look for logic here. The same is true with regard to the assessments that are being heard from NATO capitals about our forced retaliatory step. Moreover, our reciprocal step is three steps by NATO. Because our representation was cut three times. And most importantly, we are simply not allowed to work there. It was officially said that all contacts between the military were cut off. Then what kind of loss of opportunities for dialogue are we talking about? We proposed two years ago through the mouth of the chief of the gene. of the headquarters of the armed forces of the Russian Federation Valery Gerasimov to agree on the withdrawal of exercises at a certain distance from the contact line between Russia and NATO, to agree on the minimum distances that should not be violated by combat aircraft and warships. And much more has been suggested. Just a wall of silence. And when the minister in. Affairs of Germany said today that by its step Russia shows that it is not ready for negotiations. I just told you how we were ready to negotiate. And how NATO has been ignoring us for more than one year. In such statements and assessments of Western representatives, there is an understanding of the loss of their position, and the desire to blame someone else and the lack of diplomatic culture.

Look at our former Soviet republics. What have they done with their sovereignty? When they just got it. They immediately found someone to sell it to. Even just give it up for a song.

Here you have New Orleans flooded. And instantly all democracy disappeared somewhere, the territory of law disappeared somewhere, and no one protects any interests of minorities. There is also a feature of human nature. And often the need for the state is to fight the base manifestations of human nature. The main task of the state is not to build heaven, but to prevent hell.

Well, if these are serious politicians, then they probably need to get additional education - both in the history of Russia and in international law in general.

But the imperial mentality remained. He just mutated.

China controls its social media. They are raising a generation that has an inner barrier. We are the most vulnerable in this regard. Because our youth grows up under the influence of social networks that accept other people's algorithms, other people's views, and we don't know whose.

- Fairness or legality? Because, for example, some Spanish crown expelled the Jews, I think that the population of Spain applauded. When there were religious wars in France, part of the population believed that this was fair. Moreover, we see how in many countries over a thousand-year history no democracy grows, no matter what fig leaves they put on. Maybe we need to abandon the doctrine that everything will end in democracy anyway. The very concept of democracy as such no longer exists. You,. Stankevich, you are proposing a set that does not work now. This model is deprecated. The Libyan Jamahiriya provided maximum justice, security and so on. There was the highest standard of living, security and everything else.

Our tragedy is that ... Let's try to name the great philosophers. We will have difficulty thinking. and when we name a few names, it turns out that there are no schools that they represent. That is, the tradition of comprehending the social processes taking place in the world has disintegrated. We are using an outdated apparatus, trying to force it on fundamentally different changes. We cannot stop and think. Because there are tasks that need to be addressed pragmatically. That is why the left field has gone now? Coronavirus. It became clear that it was impossible to solve general health problems in the conditions of mass psychosis of a real illness and failure of all systems. And now the private sector, the capitalist says: I will defend myself, I will build myself, and you all do not touch me. This does not work.

- Of course, that's what we are talking about. They are well aware of the disastrous nature of upgrading a system. Therefore, they regularly try to shove us this project, we are constantly told that the most important thing in a democracy is the turnover of power. What's more important? - the will of the people or the postulate imposed by someone who is not clear about the need for change?

A bastard comes who says: the Jews are to blame for everything, let's rob them. And everyone applauds: the standard of living is growing. If they told him that he needed a turnover, he would say: well, now Goering will go instead of me.

What old horse doesn't dream of a new furrow?

Issuance or non-issue of visas for political reasons. Shelters. Political support of those people who abroad are considered not just criminals, but terrorists and murderers. You remember our tragedy in the North Caucasus. How many scoundrels, scumbags, and murderers, real terrorists were sheltered by Britain. This is also part of the culture. There is good, and there is also very bad in their culture.