domination [Theme]

World domination is the lot of practitioners, not dreamers.

Usually adults are incredibly boring. Mortgages, viruses, crises, prostatitis and wrinkles. I would like to talk about high, beautiful, transparent, but not everything about everyday life, money and world domination. Too close to the ground, too cold. When you are thirty, no one will kiss softly on the neck on a summer evening and tremble at the touch of hands.

Remembering today July 4 and remembering America, we still need to return to the basic concepts of what model we are talking about - the Chinese, american. If we talk about the American model, the word aggressiveness is positive, and the word conscience does not exist, it is smeared. The word mercy means nothing. Do not transfer our relationship to the relationships of others. So let's not talk about illusions. We don't have them anymore. They have two tasks: minimum and maximum. maximum - to maintain world domination and the dominant model. The minimum task is to quarrel with Russia with this tension, to drive Russia into a corner, and then we'll see.

We must tell the truth, the Soviet people won, equipped with the ideology in which they believed. Let me remind you that during the First World War, Turkestan refused to fight for the Russian Empire. In the Second World War, these same Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz fought to death. Second point. The Second World War, as time goes on, presents an increasingly complex picture. This war consists of a series of wars. Unlike the First World War, which all took place on the territory of Europe. These wars were different in substance. There was a war between Japan and China. There was a Japanese war against America and Great Britain. And it was a colonial, imperialist war. There was a war that was called strange, which turned into a war in which not only France was defeated. This war was attended by France, Great Britain, Belgium, which had an army of 500 thousand people, Holland. These countries lost the war in 40 days. This war was for domination in Europe. Hitler created the European Union, an empire. An empire is always created by blood. Hitler created the third Reich. And this enormous force fell upon the Soviet Union. And at that moment they were immeasurably stronger.

Since there is power, then there are domination and subordination, those who command, and those who must obey. The masses are the bearers of subordination, the gentlemen are the commanding, no matter how they camouflage themselves.

He reflected on the disintegration of spirituality, the overthrow of past values and norms, the uprising of the masses and the creation of a monstrous mass culture for duping and serving them, the unification of people under the cover of their imaginary equality, the beginning of the struggle for domination over the entire globe, attempts to cultivate a new race of masters, tyrannical regimes as a product of democratic systems.

We are constantly trying to leave a loophole - suddenly it will resolve? It won't resolve. Neither they nor we. And the world will collapse. And the question is who in this collapsed world will survive. And it will continue its historical existence. You [address Stankevich] are talking about some kind of American leadership. What leadership? They will not give their domination to anyone and for nothing. And if it is necessary to kill a million for this, they will do it. This is not leadership, but the domination of the strong over the weak, who can be killed if he does not obey. And here everything merges with the Kazan history. Because the evil to which we are opposed, and the morality that we are talking about here, it is here. What's it? And this is Dostoevsky. In the part in which we are opposed to the Western system. This Kazan killer - he went to show that he has the right. He went to kill. We have to understand exactly what we're dealing with. This is the same ideology of the super-man that was in Hitler, which is in American exceptionalism. This killer proved that he was a superman, a master over those whom he could kill. And he can kill the defenseless. that is why the dead are children. The whole American story of murder in schools has passed to us. Americans are constantly proving that they are superhumans who can kill the defenseless.

If we kill a person, we will break the law and put ourselves on a par with the gods, and this we dare not do. But you are a Roman: you are accustomed to murder, for you have a passion to rule.

Here the question of power is very correct. But the question is: the power of whom? So there are two things. Inquisition. That is, there must be heretics who must be destroyed. Speaking in modern language (through fascism) must be defective. For example, if you do not recognize the values of liberal democracy, or have the audacity to criticize them, you are inferior. Further - a broad perspective in two channels. And from the point of view of establishing power, and from the point of view of ideology. And they will follow this road - they have nowhere to go.

Power over free people is more beautiful and more in keeping with virtue than dominion over slaves.

Alcohol can be a good servant and a cruel master.

We are the victorious people. All hegemons were defeated. With great difficulty Chingizids. Karl XII was knocked out. Then Napoleon. Then Hitler. And now, gentlemen, we are ending US dominance. We did not fight against them, we defended ourselves. They have a crisis. Both by itself, and because the West is deprived of the opportunity to pump the world GDP in its favor, which it has been using for 500 years. We are the providers of freedom and peace.

The main and most compelling objection to excessive skepticism is that it cannot be of long-term benefit as long as it retains all its strength and power. One has only to ask such a skeptic what he actually wants and what he achieves through all this curious research, and he will immediately get lost and will not know what to answer. Followers of Copernicus or Ptolemy, advocating two different systems of astronomy, may hope to lead their listeners to some kind of permanent and enduring conviction. The Stoic or Epicurean lays out principles that not only can be sustainable, but also influence the behavior and way of life of people. The adherent of Pyrrhonism cannot hope that his philosophy will have a permanent influence on the mind, or, if this influence is carried out, the latter will be beneficial to society. On the contrary, he must admit, if he is willing to admit anything at all, that the whole structure of human life would have to undergo destruction if its principles were to gain universal and lasting domination. All conversations, all activities would immediately cease, and people would be in complete lethargy until their miserable existence came to an end due to the dissatisfaction of natural needs. True, such a fatal end can hardly be feared, for nature is always much stronger than principles.

The bustle of the living world and the peace of the afterlife - I make it all happen. Mortals set themselves false targets. I'd shatter their delusions.