military [Theme] Page 2

My answer is Nikolai Vasilievich. The fact is that in all doctrinal documents Russia is spelled out as an adversary. But on the basis of this strategy, military construction and military appropriations are being carried out. The problem is broader than this summit. They met? and it's good that they met. Has a new strategic stability emerged? There is only one root left of this strategic stability. And other laws will not be adopted until a measure of confidence is reached. Can we trust the Americans after what they have done? Until trust builds up, strategic stability does not emerge either.

Do military victories provide grounds for cultural humiliation of another nation?

And then the war years worked: a weak, half-starved, and even in the fifth grade, when we have a wounded Pe-2 plane in Khvoinoy, he came in for landing, cut the tops of three pine trees near the railway bridge, crashed into the house where the Zagotzerno office was located. 11 people were killed. They are buried in our cemetery in a mass grave. I then ran away from the lesson to Zagotzern, saw all this terrible tragedy and vowed: I will be a pilot.

- BoJack, I'm sure you'll agree that the U.S. military is heroes!
- I disagree. Maybe some military and heroes, but not all. Many military men are morons, many people are morons in their own right. If you give a moron a gun and allow people to be killed, it doesn't make a moron a hero.

The feeling that the world is preparing for a big war. Military spending is growing every year. It would seem that this year they should grow for the development of vaccines, for medicine. Humanity is not only not trying to come to its senses, on the contrary, it is confidently emerging from the coronavirus year into some kind of absolute disaster. The leaders here are, of course, Americans.

You see, if you teach a dog to eat potatoes, and then put a piece of meat on it, it will still grab the meat, because it is in its blood. And if you give a person a piece of power, it will be the same with him: he will grab onto it. This happens by itself, because a person as such is, first of all, a beast, and unless he has a layer of decency on top, is like a crust of bread on which bacon has been smeared. All military service consists in the fact that one has power over the other. The only bad thing is that everyone has too much of it.

"This is his method."

Much has already been written about the "Crimean Spring" of 2014 over the past five years, but the book by Viktor Barants is the first most complete documentary and artistic study of this epochal theme. In addition to the documentary side of the events, the author tried to look into the souls of his heroes - the main characters of this historical drama. The author sought answers to his questions not only in the Kremlin offices, but also in trips to post-Maidan Ukraine and Crimea, where he met with both supporters of the return of the peninsula to Russia and opponents.
He had the opportunity to learn about what was happening in the Kremlin, in the Ministry of Defense, in the General Staff in those anxious days and nights when Kiev was smoking in the frenzy of the Maidan.
Foreign military experts were forced to admit that the actions of "polite people" during the Crimean operation were highly professional.
Starting from the hidden concentration of troops and the speed of their transfer to the Crimea, and ending with the competent blocking of Ukrainian units in cooperation with the forces of the Crimean self-defense.
The author is sure: "polite people" played a historical role in the return of the Crimea.
They, together with local self-defense units, not only saved the peninsula from a bloody civil war, but also provided all the conditions for the peaceful and free expression of the will of the Crimeans in the referendum on March 16, 2014.
This book is a tribute to the Russian Soldier and Citizen of Crimea, who restored historical justice.

In all likelihood, the American is a good patriot. And if you ask him, he will sincerely say that he loves his country, but at the same time it turns out that he does not love Morgan, does not know and does not want to know the names of the people who designed the suspension bridges in San Francisco, is not interested in why in America with every year the drought intensifies, who built the Boulder Dame and why, why the Southern states lynch blacks and why he should eat chilled meat. He will say that he loves his country. But he is deeply indifferent to the issues of agriculture, since he is not a farmer, industry, since he is not an industrialist, finance, since he is not a financier, arts, since he is not an artist, and military issues, since he is not a military man. He's a hard worker, gets his thirty dollars a week and doesn't give a damn about Washington with its laws, Chicago with its gangsters, and New York with its Wall Street. From his country, he asks only one thing - to leave him alone and not interfere with his listening to the radio and going to the cinema.

The eighties of the twentieth century became a turning point in the modern history and fate of Russia. The author of the book is a direct participant in the events described, in those years the Ambassador-at-Large, the head of the USSR delegation to the Stockholm Conference on Disarmament in Europe, talks about how the foreign policy of the Soviet Union changed during the transition period from Brezhnev to Gorbachev and what changes began in the Foreign Ministry with the arrival of the new minister E. Shevardnadze. You will learn at the cost of what efforts and confrontations the new policy of the USSR and the United States in the field of international security was formed and what actually happened then, in 1983-1987, behind the Kremlin walls ...

Life is never-ending military action, differing only in the scale of operations.

Since the reign of Peter the Great, foreign scientists, military, diplomats, artists faithfully served the Russian monarchy. There were many immigrants from Germany among them. Their descendants settled in Russia, preserving the language and some traditions that underwent changes over time in the Russian manner, and as a result became often even more Russian than the indigenous people. What can I say, it came to the point that the Russian autocrats could rightly be called Germans. The establishment of family ties between the dynasties began with the marriage of the parents of Peter III - Tsarevna Anna Petrovna and Duke of Holstein-Gottorp Karl Friedrich. After that, the process became irreversible, and two centuries later the Romanovs already had a dominant percentage of German blood.

Not many Americans know what magnitude reached in the US military chemical-biological research. The total government expenditure for the development of chemical and biological weapons exceeds $ 500 million per year. The Johns Hopkins University performed a program of comparative study of existing or potential diseases of interest for the conduct of bacteriological warfare, and the study of some chemical and immunological reactions to certain toxoids and vaccines.

And second. Let's see how they consistently unleash yourself and doctrinal, and technological hands to the conduct of hostilities in the so-called lower end of the spectrum: cyber warfare, private military campaigns and anti-guerrilla warfare, support of all kinds of extreme opposition. They are preparing for a hot war. Another thing is that they are preparing for this war is not yet with us, most likely to a low-intense hot war. But the problem is that they do not understand that deterrence as a system is a double-edged thing. And it can shoot in both directions. They think that the fire will only. And this is me most worried. We are dealing with a very irresponsible elite in the United States, which burned expertise. They have no experts who can explain the political elite that it is. And not in the political elite of people who can hear it. That's the trouble.