summary [Theme] Page 2

With the birth of a person, the whole world appears .... there is no past ... and as a result - the end of the world ... for each his own ....

Climate Summit kicked off in Glasgow today. And why is this topic being promoted? This summit is holding some kind of intermediate result. For if earlier America divided countries into democracy and non-democracy, now it will divide into those who fit and those who do not fit the climate agenda. Global warming is becoming a new weapon. It is not difficult to guess how it will end. The natural resources of the states will be declared a world heritage. Not national. And if a sovereign state disposes of its natural resources incorrectly from the point of view of the United States, then foreign intervention is possible. That is, sovereignty will be put on cancellation with the help of a new climate policy. A very beautiful scheme. If a country behaves unreasonably and threatens the existence of all mankind, then the progressive part of mankind has no other way out. So, then we must sacrifice this country, this people. The situation is very beautiful. I remember everything that seemed to us nonsense. This phrase was attributed to Albright. That Russia has no right to all of its natural resources. Everyone thought it was fake. And now we have lived to the point where fakes become true. But only from the lips of other people. How great it turns out. Russia is to blame. And when Putin says: wait a minute. We, firstly, absorb for the whole world. We have forests. What they say: do not be fooled. Your job is to cut. And what - will the troops be brought in?

The origins of fear in Freud coincide with the "scientific thesis" in 1 John. However, the diametrical difference is that the author of the message speaks of love in a spiritual sense, and Freud in its elementary, sexual meaning (libido). But is the chasm insurmountable? We do not want to narrow it down, but it is worth considering the following: it is indisputable that even the highest spiritual experiences do not pass in the mental life without bodily sensations, although they do not have to be sexual. Some psychologists, the same William James and Karl Lange, even went so far as to mistakenly believe that feelings are just the result of innervation of muscles and blood vessels ... higher intellectual functions. On the other hand, Freud, studying sex drive, over time expanded the concept of sexuality, admitting into it the Platonic idea of Eros and the German word "Liebe" - love. This terminology has led to endless confusion. But Freud emphasized more than once: by "sexuality" he means everything that includes the word "love" - and if you remember this, the objection that his theory is pansexual loses its validity. This view is supported by other arguments. And I do not know of a single psychologist who can argue against John, who brings fear out of love. Only in the Bible is fear perceived more spiritually and therefore not as widely as in modern psychology.

Two misconceptions are not yet true.

Sooner or later the day comes when a person realizes that the only author of what happens to him is himself.

I often spat on everyone's bloody faces.
Those gentlemen who don't like to share... If
I need something - I'll have to give - I
And I can make big men cry.
Moscow wanted to give itself to us without a fight, yes...
There's a lot of baba in her, she's afraid of robbery. You know
But it turned out that if you're cool, wow,
You'll either be bought here or killed.

No, it is better to wait for the denouement - it should come by itself, in the natural course of things;

And we don’t believe in long-forgotten fairy tales.

Let's summarize, while the results did not disappoint us.

A consequence of the same reason.
Causa Aequat effectum.

As of its existence more and more starting to think we need to organize rather shoot people than stray animals.

the day passed like many,
and again at the end of the day
I sit, summing up,
and the results bring me.

If I start to think about the meaning of life, I want to die.