feeling [Theme] Page 5

You know this feeling when something awesome happens to you and you don't think about it right away? And when you start, do you think more and more? And the more you think, the crazy everything seems, and in the end you panic and the moment slides into stink? Yeah, it's better not to bring it to that today.

You've probably never fallen under the ice on a frozen creek. Here's how it goes.
1. You are cold. It's so cold that the Department of Temperature Assessment and Regulation, upon learning of this, declares: "No, it's you without us, we pass," hangs up a sign "Lunch" and puts all the responsibility on..
2. The department of pain and reaction to it, which, having received abracadabra from the temperature department, in which nothing understands ("Is it our business?"), begins to press all the buttons in a row, causing you strange sensations and connecting to work..
3. Department of confusion and panic, where there is always someone who is ready on the first call to come to the phone. In this department, they are just waiting to get to work. Everyone knows that the Department of Confusion and Panic loves to press buttons.

And while others are pondering how to foresee all the details and avoid mistakes, we do, spontaneously change the situation and get indescribable sensations!

Oleg himself in the depths of his soul could not yet admit that he decided to abandon everything he had acquired only because of some feeling of the need to resume the search for a long-lost interesting person, life next to whom was energetic, unusual and to some extent fantastic.

... we are stylistically still in the Soviet past or in the perestroika period and we are measuring everything: Soviet or anti-Soviet. Listen, the world has moved on. Everything! Things got more complicated. And it makes no sense to return. And it makes no sense to absolutize what we read in books on capitalism in the late 80s and 90s. This is quite obvious. The tasks facing such a huge country as Russia require some kind of complex, but new in quality model, taking into account all the achievements of the past and adapted to the challenges of the present and the future. And how it will be called, I understand that this is important in the discussion, but it can be called in different ways. As for me, the name Orthodox socialism would suit me. Why? I explain. Orthodox not from the point of view of imposing a confession, but from the point of view of the realization that our moral and ethical foundations are still based on the roots of the Orthodox faith and Orthodox culture. And socialism - not from the point of view of a return to Soviet practice, but from the point of view of the feeling that a really huge number of people do not feel justice. People want the truth.

Realized that I had missed it. All emotions raged inside. From the feeling of a lump in his throat, to emptiness ... And there was only one thought on his mind: to find him and apologize. There is nothing worse than human thought than its absence.

One of the most terrible insults for me was the fact that in the movie Alien vs. Predator, the predator - this primitive scum - easily defeated the Alien. I remember it made a terrible impression on me. I watched the film to the end, and then stood under the shower for a long time, because I could not get rid of the feeling that I was being ransomed in shit.

A few seconds they stood silent, he was hugging her breath tickled his ear. Most people live a lifetime, never having felt so close, thought Marianne.

Comfort zone the crowd - the place where evil is born. We are talking about the phenomenon when a person does the same as the rest. He doesn't want to face social pressure and lose the feeling of comfort, which inevitably would have happened if he'd stood out from the "herd". People, therefore, are not evil in themselves, they are just not able to resist the crowd or to Express an opinion contrary to the majority opinion.

Sensations of pleasure and fullness of meaning - it's the only thing that matters. Hedonism is a school of thought that believes pleasure is the only significant factor. Adding to the fun sense of meaning, I define my position as a position sensitive (sentimental) hedonism. I'm sentimental hedonist, and I think deep down we all are.

The attention, time and money - three important resources. Time and money we are better known. There's even a science that deals with time and money - they're called "labour" and "capital". But what is "attention", we do not understand, although to date it is the most valuable of the three resources is the most important for success and a feeling of happiness.

It should be noted that the hero of the film "Russia. The Kremlin. Putin" Vladimir Putin wrote a very important article about the Second world war, which is not only a past but also a road map for the future. The greatest tragedy caused a fatal chain of events. But the main reason is state egoism, cowardice, pandering to the gaining strength of the aggressor, the unwillingness of political elites to compromise. We are not afraid to admit their mistakes, but not allow ourselves to be accused in the wrong. Because the mockery of the memory of meanness. We opened our archives and are waiting for the same steps from the allied countries. We are for honest conversation. And so Russia has proposed to hold the summit five. China (XI Jinping), France (macron), America (trump), Britain (Johnson) our initiative was supported. One it is important for leaders to show political will and work together to discuss the future, other countries, such as Poland, the Baltic States, only a pretext for political provocations. When I read an article (a great article) and I strongly recommend its reading... first, I do not recall that the head of such level wrote an article which analyzes the behavior and motives of the main players of world war II. It's one thing when it is written by historians, journalists... But when a person with this level of responsibility, analyses of what, why, and how it was made, it adds a special touch. Then I realize that hardly anyone can now available in the world politicians of this level, well maybe except for XI Jinping, to write an article that will fully reflect the feelings of the majority of the citizens of his country. Trump can't write such an article. Boris Johnson, the brilliant journalist, but I doubt he would want to write such an article. For him it is ancient history. We are very much curious, but for me it is also the answer to my eternal debate with N. V. Zlobin. Zlobin kept saying that in foreign policy there should be no morality. What Putin says, I don't remember to have said so in such terms about the modern acts of today's politicians. Here a direct allusion to America, and to Poland and to the Baltic States, and, of course, to Ukraine. Very, very tough.

The leitmotif is the theme of the Third Rome. Many misunderstand this concept, and suggests that the separation of Ukraine and the rift with Constantinople marks the end of the concept of the Third Rome. In fact, it is exactly the opposite. The third Rome is not a concept of a world Empire, or even a large Imperial space. It is about something else. Rather, it is the concept of civilizational loneliness. After the fall of Byzantium, Moscow has realized that the world center of Orthodoxy in its previous form no longer exists, but rather that it is such a center. Itself is Rome. And the current self-discrediting of the Patriarchate of Constantinople causes similar sensations. And the geopolitical situation in the world, too, makes you remember or think about loneliness as a constant of Russian history. And in this sense it is correct to say that the time of the third Rome did not leave, they come back, and in my opinion, it was not the worst time in the history of the Russian Church and the Russian state.

We always thought that we know enough, when you finish your education and become adults. And so we grow, and everyone thinks we're older and we in any case do not know enough. How we cope with the incompleteness of your knowledge, is the key to our feeling of fullness of life. If I need to hide from myself how much I don't know and pretend I have a reasonable and sound basis for all my actions, I have to deny a big part of his awareness - as yourself, and the world in which we live. If I try to avoid these difficulties, you can go the way of Jennifer, attributing responsibility rules by the way Louise, relying on other people, the way Frank, denies all values, or can choose other ways to avoid understanding their own limitations. By doing this, I reduce its vitality.