tools [Theme] Page 4

And I do not care about it, I know how much!

But again, the question arises: what does the Soviet Union have to do with it? Oh yes, on September 17, 1939, we also entered the territory of Poland, committing a terrible crime against the Polish statehood. What norms are we talking about at all? In this case, there are four of them: the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921, the Paris Briand-Kellogg Pact, the non-aggression pact between Poland and the USSR of 1932 and, finally, the Convention on the Definition of Aggression of 1933. Document titles are large-scale. And if you do not know what they contain, probably, you really just need to sprinkle ashes on your head, the whole country to fall to its knees and ask the proud Polish gentry to forgive us. But as soon as you open the first of these documents, it will immediately turn out that there is nothing to repent of, in general. And Poland, to put it mildly, distorts the cards. Let's start with the fundamental document in all this history - the Convention on the Definition of Aggression. Today, those Poles who call on the peoples of Russia to repent for 1939, for some reason forget to clarify that this document was proposed by Moscow, that is, the Soviet Union. The convention has an important point: "The invasion of its armed forces, at least without declaring war on the territory of another state." That is, the entry of troops of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus could be regarded as a violation. But this convention, despite all the proposals of Moscow, was never adopted, which means that it did not become a document of international law. This happened thanks to the position of Great Britain and France. And Poland was not eager to support this document. But that's half the trouble. The problem is that a convention cannot exist on its own. It was to be part of a thrice international agreement on arms limitation. You probably won't be surprised if I say that the agreement was not signed. That is, the Soviet Union is accused of violating the main provisions of international law, although these provisions are spelled out in documents that were not adopted, and at the same time proposed to adopt them by the USSR. Now let's turn to the Briand-Kellogg Pact, which the Soviet Union brazenly ignored in order to destroy Polish statehood. It has a clause condemning war as a means of settling international disputes. Awesome. Let's admit that there was indeed a misunderstanding between Moscow and Warsaw. So what happens? In September 1939, Germany attacks Poland, war begins, then Great Britain and France declare war on Germany. And then comes September 17, 1939. The Soviet Union introduces troops into the territory of Western Belarus, Western Ukraine. Did Great Britain and France declare war on the Soviet Union for violating the Briand-Kellogg Pact? Of course not. Let's ask a more complicated question: did Poland declare war on the Soviet Union? You will be surprised, but not only was war not declared on the Soviet Union, the Polish army was ordered categorically not to engage in hostilities with the troops of the Red Army. In other words, the Polish government then, in 1939, did not regard the entry of Red Army troops into the territory of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus as a violation of the Briand-Kellogg Pact. <... > And since the Briand-Kellogg Pact does not add up very well, they immediately occupy the following line of defense: the non-aggression pact between Poland and the Soviet Union of 1932 was violated. <... > The defeat of Poland in the war with Germany automatically meant the termination of the 1932 treaty. Agree, if one of the two partners by the standards of international law ceases to exist, how and at what expense should the treaty operate? For some reason, Polish political scientists and experts do not want to categorically talk about this. How they are not going to talk about the fact that the Soviet Union in the autumn of 1939 complied with absolutely all the norms of international law: the government of the USSR summoned the Polish ambassador in Moscow and notified him that in connection with the defeat of Poland in the war with the Third Reich, the 1932 treaty was now terminated.

... Mein Kampf clearly defines the vector for the development of German foreign policy. Yes, the Fuhrer always thought big and it does not say that the Slavs need to be slaughtered at the root in the coming years. However, I do not recommend forgetting about the “land in the East”, especially since the notes of the Barbarossa plan say everything quite clearly: “In these areas, we must consciously pursue a policy of population reduction. By means of propaganda, especially through the press, radio, cinema, leaflets, short brochures, reports, etc., we must constantly inspire the population with the idea that it is harmful to have many children. It is necessary to show how much money it costs to raise children and what could be purchased with these funds. It is necessary to talk about the great danger to the health of a woman, to which she is exposed, giving birth to children. Expand the broadest propaganda of contraceptives. Establish their wide production. The distribution of these funds and abortion should in no way be restricted. Contribute in every possible way to the expansion of the network of abortion clinics. Organize special retraining of midwives and paramedics and train them in the production of abortions. Physicians must also have permission to perform abortion, and this should not be considered a violation of medical ethics. It would be best for us if they could explain themselves at all on the fingers. Unfortunately, this is not possible. Therefore - to limit everything as much as possible! No printed editions. The most basic radio broadcasts. We must disaccustom them to think. No compulsory schooling. We must understand that the literacy of Russians, Ukrainians and all the others is only harmful. There will always be a couple of bright minds who will find ways to study their history, then come to political conclusions that will ultimately be directed against us. Therefore, gentlemen, do not try to organize any radio broadcasts on historical topics in the occupied regions. No! In every village in the square there is a loudspeaker pole to deliver the news and entertain the listeners. Yes, to entertain and distract from attempts to acquire political, scientific, and generally any kind of knowledge. The radio should broadcast as much simple, rhythmic and fun music as possible. It invigorates and increases the ability to work. "

Having reached the last extreme, the man, no longer understanding, grabs the most extreme means. Woe to the defenseless creatures around him! He has no more work, no earnings, no bread, no fuel, no courage, no goodwill; he immediately loses everything. Outside, daylight is extinguished, inside - a moral torch.

At the birth of new religions, wise and learned people usually consider the question [of the miracles associated with them] too insignificant to merit their attention or consideration; and later, when they would willingly open a deception in order to dissuade the erring crowd, it turns out that the time has already passed, documents and witnesses who could clarify the case have died irrevocably; they have no means of exposure other than those that must be extracted from the testimony of the witnesses themselves; but, although these means always satisfy intelligent and educated people, they are usually too subtle for understanding the crowd.

If you want to have good prospects and to live well, be able to fight against the difficulties of life. Don't do useless things that degrade the quality of your life, don't worry about someone else's life, which brings no benefit to you, don't worry about other people's achievements and rewards will not make you happier, do not worry and do not worsen your health because of those who won't return your feelings and will not help in the most difficult moment, do not be friends with bad people who only bring trouble and trouble. But do yourself and your development, to invest their time, their money, power and opportunity in useful, valuable, important, things, things.

I have lived beyond their means and die means.

- What is the monument of the Empire?
- It is in order: only the Empire can put up a monument because it has the means for such a monument and because only it has the highest point before the inevitable death. Bad or good, but let him remember her: she is the Supreme connection of perfection and ugliness, God and man. All the rest went to play provincials.
- So what are your secret thoughts, - said Socrates.
I have to think. Not my will performed, but the will of history. Herodotus today said it well: "Sitting on a lion can't jump with him voluntarily". Remember?
Remember. But because you control the will of the people is all they see.
But only to the extent that it allows him control. The cart itself is heading only down, but up it must either pull or push, and then when enough power or if not too large, the steepness of the climb. Let go of the cart and everything will fly into the abyss. I have been pushing this big old cart.

Versatile means of self-defense explains the different types of attacks and types of attackers.

Our stay in Chita was, to some extent, for the benefit of residents belonging to the mining office and managed by mountain officials. Most of them were very poor, but we had all the means to improve their condition. The costs of our ladies and the cost of casemate annually extended to one hundred thousand in banknotes, most of which was spent in Chita itself.

... Against the spleen no means better than an hour or two desperate efforts.

The main problem of the Russian production, especially greenhouse is that people have no money, without which hope for accelerated development is impossible. The second problem is that we are uncompetitive. I'm not even saying that we are sitting on imported technology, imported seeds that we have almost all plant protection chemicals from abroad.

Any ideas on what to do if you get caught? You should always remember that the most important thing in this robbery. To win time. And for this you should exhaust all possible means to achieve this.

Question: do animals Follow the law of progress like humans?
Answer: Yes, therefore, in the highest worlds, where people are more developed, the animals also developed more whiter and have sophisticated means of communication; but they are always below the man and subservient to him; they are his clever servant.
Question: do animals Progress, like a man, on his will or it happens by force of things [independently - another translation]?
Answer: the Force of things; so for them there is no redemption.
Question: In the upper worlds do animals know about God?
Answer: No, for them God, as once the spirits were gods to the people.